ABSTRACT. Molecular epidemiology analyses of the 36 clinical isolates of Pasteurella multocida from various avian hosts in Japan between 1976 to 2007 including 5 reference strains from the U.S.A., Taiwan and Indonesia were performed by employing the single-enzyme amplified fragment length polymorphism (SE-AFLP) comparison with the classical ApaI-based pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). As the results, SE-AFLP gave 21 profiles while PFGE gave 20 profiles. The Simpson's index of diversity analysis indicated that SE-AFLP gave a high discrimination power than PFGE. This concluded that SE-AFLP is a higher discrimination power than PFGE to differentiate avian P. multocida isolates in Japan. In addition, the genetical profiles suggested that there is the evolution of somatic serotype 3 strain in the indigenous host of Japan.KEY WORDS: discrimination power, Pasteurella multocida, PFGE, SE-AFLP.J. Vet. Med. Sci. 72(11): 1465-1470, 2010 Fowl cholera is an important disease in poultry industry around the world. Pasteurella multocida of the gram negative bacteria is recognized as the etiologic agent of fowl cholera [16,18]. The bacterium can be classified by capsular serogrouping into 5 serogroups (A, B, D, E and F) [6,17] and by lipopolysaccharide into 16 somatic serotypes (1-16) [5]. Fowl cholera usually appears a septicemic disease in the acute or peracute conditions associated with the high mortality and morbidity but the chronic conditions are also observed [16,18]. In Japan, strain of P. multocida capsular serogroup A and somatic serotype 3 was predominated among avian isolates and strains of somatic serotypes 1, 4 and 10 were also isolated [20]. Some of the clinical isolates were determined for their capsulation and virulence for chicken by the observation of their colonies by electron microscope or obliquely-transmitted light stereomicroscope and experimental infection in chickens [4]. Our previous investigations indicated the genetic variation of the adhesive protein gene among each isolates by PCR-RFLP employing the HindIII and EcoRI digestion [21]. However, the genetic epidemiology of these isolates needs to be clarified.Since a number of DNA-based typing systems have been employed to characterize the isolates [1,3,10,14,15]. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) is recognized as the classical DNA-based typing method of the isolates. However, the higher discrimination power DNA-based typing methods have been demonstrated. Previous studies suggested that the amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) have been recognized as the typing method that showed the higher power of discrimination than either PFGE or the random amplified polymorphism DNA (RAPD) [1,8]. However, the DNA-based typing method requires more knowledge about DNA to analyze [8]. Then, the recent study employed the SE-AFLP and PFGE to differentiate avian P. multocida isolates in Japan and the discriminatory power of the typing methods was also compared.
MATERIALS AND METHODSBacterial strains and growth condition: P. multocida strains were ...