2019
DOI: 10.5004/dwt.2019.23781
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capture and adsorption behavior of iodine by edible γ-CD-MOFs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Obviously, AgNPs@UiO-66 owns almost twice the adsorption capacity that of UiO-66, declaring that the AgNPs could effectively improve the adsorption ability of MOFs for I 2 . It is noteworthy that such a high capacity of AgNPs@UiO-66 outperforms most adsorbents (Table ), such as amino-functionalized MIL-101-NH 2 (311 mg/g), Cu-load Cu/MIL-101 (432 mg/g), porous carbon (AK-2, 336 mg/g), and other materials. , Actually, the difference in I 2 adsorption capacity between UiO-66 and AgNPs@UiO-66 can be directly observed with the naked eye. As shown in Figure D, when UiO-66 and AgNPs@UiO-66 of the same mass were dispersed into I 2 solutions with the same concentration, AgNPs@UiO-66 absorbed most of the I 2 and changed the solution color from purple to colorless, while the I 2 solution containing UiO-66 remained purple after 12 h. This intuitive adsorption difference between UiO-66 and AgNPs@UiO-66 further confirms that AgNPs play a key role in the I 2 adsorption process.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Obviously, AgNPs@UiO-66 owns almost twice the adsorption capacity that of UiO-66, declaring that the AgNPs could effectively improve the adsorption ability of MOFs for I 2 . It is noteworthy that such a high capacity of AgNPs@UiO-66 outperforms most adsorbents (Table ), such as amino-functionalized MIL-101-NH 2 (311 mg/g), Cu-load Cu/MIL-101 (432 mg/g), porous carbon (AK-2, 336 mg/g), and other materials. , Actually, the difference in I 2 adsorption capacity between UiO-66 and AgNPs@UiO-66 can be directly observed with the naked eye. As shown in Figure D, when UiO-66 and AgNPs@UiO-66 of the same mass were dispersed into I 2 solutions with the same concentration, AgNPs@UiO-66 absorbed most of the I 2 and changed the solution color from purple to colorless, while the I 2 solution containing UiO-66 remained purple after 12 h. This intuitive adsorption difference between UiO-66 and AgNPs@UiO-66 further confirms that AgNPs play a key role in the I 2 adsorption process.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a new kind of solid adsorbent, porous MOFs, composed of organic ligands and metal ions or clusters, have been widely applied for the removal of harmful substances and environmental remediation, thanks to their adjustable pore size, tailorable structure, as well as designable adsorption sites. Recently, MOFs have also been successfully utilized to remove radioactive I 2 . Unfortunately, the adsorption capacities in the reported MOFs are relatively low due to the weak interaction between the original frameworks and I 2 . Therefore, it is desirable to design and develop MOF materials with high I 2 adsorption capacity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another example of CD-MOFs in gas storage is provided by Yu et al, who explored the potential of g-CD-MOFs for the adsorption and storage of radioactive iodine from nuclear energy production. 122 They reported a maximum iodine gas uptake of 104 wt% and a maximum liquid adsorption capacity of 449.71 mg g À1 at 298 K and suggested a spontaneous and endothermic nature of the iodine adsorption.…”
Section: Storage Separation and Removal Of Chemicalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is lined with C-H groups and offers non-polar interaction sites for various types of molecules, 50,61 thus being the structural feature that makes these materials act as excellent carriers and storage systems for drugs, gases and also inorganic compounds. 120,[122][123][124][125] For instance, a g-CD-MOF was synthesized by Zhang and coworkers for the storage and sustainable release of fragrances. 126 Molecular docking studies revealed hydrogen bonding and host-guest hydrophobic interactions as the responsible factors for holding the fragrance molecules in the g-CD-MOF.…”
Section: Cd-mofsmentioning
confidence: 99%