2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-72150-7_33
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capturing the Dynamics of Hashtag-Communities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important to note that this method is independent from the choice of the algorithm used for the static community detection on the individual snapshots. Generally, the class of matching-based methods for temporal community detection [ 8 – 11 , 14 ] offers a big advantage, by allowing us to choose a static detection method for the specific data structure and question.
Fig.
…”
Section: Dynamics Of Communitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is important to note that this method is independent from the choice of the algorithm used for the static community detection on the individual snapshots. Generally, the class of matching-based methods for temporal community detection [ 8 – 11 , 14 ] offers a big advantage, by allowing us to choose a static detection method for the specific data structure and question.
Fig.
…”
Section: Dynamics Of Communitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This naturally raises the question of a temporal matching of communities resulting from static snapshots [ 8 12 ]. By incorporating higher orders of memory [ 13 ] in a method proposed in [ 14 ], long-term developments can be tracked reliably.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The basic assumption still being that 'the greater the probability of two elements co-occurring in the same article, the more strongly they are related' (Chavalarias & Cointet, 2013, p. 2). So far, these 'elements' have included for instance organizations and firms (Vaughan & You, 2010); hyperlinks (Boulton, Devriendt, Brunn, Derudder, & Witlox, 2011;Salvini & Fabrikant, 2016) or even hashtags (Lorenz, Wolf, Braun, Djurdjevac Conrad, & Hövel, 2018) in addition to the key words characterizing scientific fieldssee Peris, Meijers, and van Ham (forthcoming) for such a scientometric approach for the field of urban systems research. The increasing availability of crowdsourced 'big data' and technological advances have provided an important impetus to the application of co-occurrence analysis.…”
Section: Using Co-occurrences To Determine Inter-city Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As these clusters are only dependent on the state of the network at time t, it is then necessary to match the communities at different t with some similarity measures, e.g. Jaccard based Morini et al (2017), Lorenz et al (2018), Greene et al (2010), core-node Wang et al (2008). Methods in category (b) define clusters at t depending on current and past states of the network.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%