2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ipm.2007.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capturing the online academic reading process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…15 In Worden and Collinson's study, students' comments indicated that they preferred e-books for finding quotations, copying and pasting, while they preferred print for sustained reading. 16 Electronic textbooks, although effective, have been unpopular.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…15 In Worden and Collinson's study, students' comments indicated that they preferred e-books for finding quotations, copying and pasting, while they preferred print for sustained reading. 16 Electronic textbooks, although effective, have been unpopular.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For instance, personal annotations might focus on understanding the text (e.g., writing in definitions), whereas annotations made for a global audience would offer more critical evaluation. While there was a lack of function differentiation for comments in Qayyum's study, this may be due in part to the sameness of purpose in the personal and shared conditions (i.e., preparing for class discussion).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Likewise, in the study by Marshall and Brush (), only 8.3% of those annotations that existed in both personal and shared conditions were transferred over word for word; most were expanded upon or clarified in the shared condition. In contrast, the students in Qayyum's () study seemed not to try to make their comments more comprehensible when shared. As these students were annotating in preparation for class discussion, however, they may have had less incentive to edit than scholars whose annotations reflect their professional judgment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For collaborative reading, see among others Carmody (2010), Sorrel (2010), Weisberg (2011), Tashman and Edwards (2011), Watters (2010, Hornbaek andFrokjaer (2001), andQayyum (2008), as well as Weisberg (2011), Shanahan (2010, Purdy (2010), and Baumer et al (2008).…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%