2012
DOI: 10.1590/s2179-64912012000300005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Caracterização eletromiográfica e ultrassonográfica da função mastigatória em indivíduos com oclusão normal

Abstract: OBJETIVO: Caracterizar o controle motor dos músculos masseter e temporal e a morfologia do músculo masseter em atividades da função mastigatória em indivíduos com oclusão normal; verificar a compatibilidade entre os exames de eletromiografia de superfície (EMGs) e ultrassonografia (USG). MÉTODOS: Participaram 22 indivíduos adultos, de ambos os gêneros, sem alterações no sistema miofuncional orofacial. Os procedimentos adotados para avaliação dos participantes foram: EMGs dos músculos masseteres (MM) e temporai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The technique used and the guidelines were previously explained to the patient for data collection protocols already published 9 , 14 , 16 , 23 , 26 . During habitual mastication, it was standardized as food, a portion of french bread 5 cm 3 and signal capture time during chewing; they were analyzed in all ranges without exclusions, taking advantage of the total sample time until swallowing food.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The technique used and the guidelines were previously explained to the patient for data collection protocols already published 9 , 14 , 16 , 23 , 26 . During habitual mastication, it was standardized as food, a portion of french bread 5 cm 3 and signal capture time during chewing; they were analyzed in all ranges without exclusions, taking advantage of the total sample time until swallowing food.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The records were collected by MHI maintained for 5 seconds and repeat three times with 1 min interval addition to rest between each collection and used the average for signal normalization, equivalent to 100% of the electrical activity. The signals collected during mastication were analyzed by Root Mean Square (RMS) and expressed in microvolts (uV) 9 , 14 , 26 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instrumental assessments are quantitative and complement the clinical diagnosis of orofacial myofunctional disorders. 40,42,43 The portable ultrasound is a morphometric instrument used to assess the thickness of the orofacial muscles and identify the tongue movements involved in chewing, swallowing, and speech. 44,45 SEMG and IOPI are electrophysiological instruments used, respectively, to pick up the electrical activity of the orofacial and cervical muscles during rest, in a maximal isometric contraction, and specific tasks of stomatognathic functions, 42,43 and to measure tongue pressure in elevation, protrusion, lateralization, swallowing, and resistance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…40,42,43 The portable ultrasound is a morphometric instrument used to assess the thickness of the orofacial muscles and identify the tongue movements involved in chewing, swallowing, and speech. 44,45 SEMG and IOPI are electrophysiological instruments used, respectively, to pick up the electrical activity of the orofacial and cervical muscles during rest, in a maximal isometric contraction, and specific tasks of stomatognathic functions, 42,43 and to measure tongue pressure in elevation, protrusion, lateralization, swallowing, and resistance. 44 Instrumental evaluations allow for better clarity as to the anatomy and physiology of the systems involved and the number of activities performed (biofeedback) -however, effective therapeutic planning requires a broad and careful clinical orofacial myofunctional evaluation based on the anatomical and functional conditions of the SS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All surface electromyography (sEMG) exams were conducted by the same speech-language pathologist under the same environmental conditions. Assessment of the electric activity of masticatory muscles of the participants was based on specific methodology (18) . To this end, the sEMG was performed using a 4-channel Miotool 400 electromyography device with all channels calibrated as follows: at 500 microvolts (μV) with a bandpass filter (20-500 Hz), a notch filter (60 Hz), and 100x gain, with low noise level (<5 μV RMS).…”
Section: Evaluation Of Masticatory Muscles -Surface Electromyography mentioning
confidence: 99%