Medical Imaging 2022: Image Processing 2022
DOI: 10.1117/12.2611802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CaraNet: context axial reverse attention network for segmentation of small medical objects

Abstract: Purpose: Segmenting medical images accurately and reliably is important for disease diagnosis and treatment. It is a challenging task because of the wide variety of objects' sizes, shapes, and scanning modalities. Recently, many convolutional neural networks (CNN) have been designed for segmentation tasks and achieved great success. Few studies, however, have fully considered the sizes of objects, and thus most demonstrate poor performance for small objects segmentation. This can have a significant impact on t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To prove the effectiveness of the MAGNet proposed in this paper, we compared it with 19 classical and state-of-the-art algorithms. These include generic object detection methods, MaskRCNN [ 57 ], HTC [ 58 ], Swin-S [ 59 ], and DetectoRS [ 60 ]; medical image segmentation methods, UNet++ [ 61 ], HarDNet [ 62 ], PraNet [ 5 ], SANet [ 25 ], CaraNet [ 63 ], and UACANet-L [ 64 ]; SOD methods BASNet [ 65 ], SCRN [ 66 ], F3Net [ 51 ], and GCPANet [ 67 ]; and COD methods SINet-V1 [ 39 ], Rank-Net [ 41 ], PFNet [ 40 ], SINet-V2 [ 68 ], and ZoomNet [ 69 ]. For a fair comparison of segmentation performance, all algorithms are trained, validated, and tested using the partitioned dataset discussed in Section 4.1.1 , and the input sizes are set to 352 × 352.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To prove the effectiveness of the MAGNet proposed in this paper, we compared it with 19 classical and state-of-the-art algorithms. These include generic object detection methods, MaskRCNN [ 57 ], HTC [ 58 ], Swin-S [ 59 ], and DetectoRS [ 60 ]; medical image segmentation methods, UNet++ [ 61 ], HarDNet [ 62 ], PraNet [ 5 ], SANet [ 25 ], CaraNet [ 63 ], and UACANet-L [ 64 ]; SOD methods BASNet [ 65 ], SCRN [ 66 ], F3Net [ 51 ], and GCPANet [ 67 ]; and COD methods SINet-V1 [ 39 ], Rank-Net [ 41 ], PFNet [ 40 ], SINet-V2 [ 68 ], and ZoomNet [ 69 ]. For a fair comparison of segmentation performance, all algorithms are trained, validated, and tested using the partitioned dataset discussed in Section 4.1.1 , and the input sizes are set to 352 × 352.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, image segmentation is a quintessential part of an AI-driven CAD. To this end, we expect to use CaraNet as an image segmentation model [ 59 ]. In a 1000 × 1000 px KUB image, a kidney stone may occupy a region smaller than 20 × 20 px.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PraNet [6], SANet [28], Caranet [56] and UACANet-L [57]; salient object detection methods BASNet [58], SCRN [59], F3Net [48] and GCPANet [60]; and camouflaged object segmentation methods SINet-V1 [13], Rank-Net [15],…”
Section: Compared Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%