1986
DOI: 10.1016/0022-328x(86)80408-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbene complexes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
35
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
5
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The complexes are yellow (1,4,6) or red (2, 3, 5, 7) crystal- www.chemeurj.org line solids and are readily soluble in common organic solvents such as toluene, dichloromethane and THF, but poorly soluble in n-hexane. Complex 8 is a deep-red crystalline solid that is only poorly soluble in toluene but readily soluble in dichloromethane.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complexes are yellow (1,4,6) or red (2, 3, 5, 7) crystal- www.chemeurj.org line solids and are readily soluble in common organic solvents such as toluene, dichloromethane and THF, but poorly soluble in n-hexane. Complex 8 is a deep-red crystalline solid that is only poorly soluble in toluene but readily soluble in dichloromethane.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 From our literature search 24 we retrieved the germylene complex (2,6-tBu 2 -4-Me-C 6 H 2 O) 2 GeFe(CO) 4 as the only respective example with a trigonal planar-coordinate germanium center. 25 The Fe1-Ge1 bond length in 3 was determined to be 2.3026(5) Å [2.3041(5) Å] which is longer than that reported for (2,6-tBu 2 -4-Me-C 6 H 2 O) 2 GeFe(CO) 4 (2.240(2) Å) 25 but does not exceed the range found for the majority of related iron carbonyls (germylene-iron complexes: 2.298(2)-2.348(1) Å; ferrogermylenes: 2.4415(11) Å, 2.496(2) Å). 22,23 Interestingly, the Ge-N imine distance in 3 (Ge1-N1 = 1.755 (2) Å [1.752(2) Å]) is considerably decreased in comparison with those in Rivard's bis(imino)germylene IV (1.8194(15) Å) 15 and approaches the typical GevN bond lengths in germaimines (1.691(3)-1.704(5) Å).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Sn-O bond distances are not equal, differing by 8.2 pm in the case shown [109] and much larger at 30.7 pm in the other [110]. The stereochemistry about tin includes trigonal-planar [111,119], pseudo-tetrahedral [112][113][114]117,[120][121][122][123][124][125][126][127][128][129], trigonal-bipyramidal [115], squarepyramidal [116] and seven-coordinate [118]. 8(9) pm in the former and 210.0(9) pm in the latter.…”
Section: Figure 2 Structure Of [Chbusn^-v-s2cpcy 3 )([I-cimo(co)2(pcmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Here the bridge is seen to be CO2 molecule bridging in a μ-η -CO2 fashion by both Ο atoms to Sn an the C atom to Re. Of these the most common is iron for which thirty one derivatives are listed , Twenty two of the structures reveal that the tin and iron are directly bonded with Sn-Fe bond distances ranging from 240.8(1) pm [111] to 262.43 (21) pm [128], with an average value of 253.4 pm. Also, the metallocyclic ring (-SnOCO-) in the former is about 1° more open than in the latter, and the Re-C bond distance is 205.…”
Section: Figure 2 Structure Of [Chbusn^-v-s2cpcy 3 )([I-cimo(co)2(pcmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation