Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
The Nazarov cyclization is named after the eminent Russian chemist I. N. Nazarov (1900–1957). In the course of an extensive study on the formation of allyl vinyl ketones by the mercuric ion and acid‐catalyzed hydration of dienynes, Nazarov and his co‐workers discovered a secondary reaction to form 2‐cyclopentenones. Nazarov initially formulated a direct acid‐catalyzed closure of the allyl vinyl ketones and demonstrated the preparation of 2‐cyclopentenones from these precursors in dozens of cases. However in 1952, Braude and Coles suggested the intermediacy of carbocations and demonstrated that the formation of 2‐cyclopentenones actually proceeds via the α,α′‐divinyl ketones. This fact, together with further mechanistic clarification, has led to the current formulation of the Nazarov cyclization as the acid‐catalyzed closure of divinyl ketones to 2‐cyclopentenones. This process was already documented in 1903. Treatment of dibenzylideneacetone with concentrated sulfuric acid and acetic anhydride followed by mild alkaline hydrolysis afforded a ketol, the correct structure of which was finally proposed in 1955. Other examples of acid‐catalyzed cyclizations of divinyl ketones exist in the early literature, as do reactions which must have proceeded via divinyl ketones. A broader definition of the Nazarov cyclization includes a wide variety of precursors that under specific reaction conditions also produce 2‐cyclopentenones via divinyl ketones or their functional equivalents. A case in point is the formation of a cyclopentenone by treatment of either divinyl ketone or tetrahydropyrone with ethanolic hydrochloric acid. It is the structural variety of precursors that lends versatility to the Nazarov cyclization and which also serves as the organizational framework for this chapter. To facilitate presentation, the reaction is divided into six categories defined by the structure of the precursor: (1) cyclization of divinyl and allyl vinyl ketones, (2) cyclization of silylated (stannylated) divinyl ketones, (3) in situ generation/cyclization of divinyl ketones or equivalents, (4) generation/cyclization of divinyl ketone equivalents by solvolysis, (5) alkyne‐based precursors of divinyl ketones, and (6) coupling reactions to form and cyclize divinyl ketones. The logic of this sequence follows from the order of decreasing structural similarity of the precursors to divinyl ketones. This is intended to be comprehensive in the coverage of cyclizations which produce 2‐cyclopentenones. The related electrocyclic closure of less oxidized pentadienylic cations is not covered. The reaction was most recently reviewed in 1991. Prior to that, the Nazarov cyclization had been reviewed in 1983 and also in the context of pentannulation.
The Nazarov cyclization is named after the eminent Russian chemist I. N. Nazarov (1900–1957). In the course of an extensive study on the formation of allyl vinyl ketones by the mercuric ion and acid‐catalyzed hydration of dienynes, Nazarov and his co‐workers discovered a secondary reaction to form 2‐cyclopentenones. Nazarov initially formulated a direct acid‐catalyzed closure of the allyl vinyl ketones and demonstrated the preparation of 2‐cyclopentenones from these precursors in dozens of cases. However in 1952, Braude and Coles suggested the intermediacy of carbocations and demonstrated that the formation of 2‐cyclopentenones actually proceeds via the α,α′‐divinyl ketones. This fact, together with further mechanistic clarification, has led to the current formulation of the Nazarov cyclization as the acid‐catalyzed closure of divinyl ketones to 2‐cyclopentenones. This process was already documented in 1903. Treatment of dibenzylideneacetone with concentrated sulfuric acid and acetic anhydride followed by mild alkaline hydrolysis afforded a ketol, the correct structure of which was finally proposed in 1955. Other examples of acid‐catalyzed cyclizations of divinyl ketones exist in the early literature, as do reactions which must have proceeded via divinyl ketones. A broader definition of the Nazarov cyclization includes a wide variety of precursors that under specific reaction conditions also produce 2‐cyclopentenones via divinyl ketones or their functional equivalents. A case in point is the formation of a cyclopentenone by treatment of either divinyl ketone or tetrahydropyrone with ethanolic hydrochloric acid. It is the structural variety of precursors that lends versatility to the Nazarov cyclization and which also serves as the organizational framework for this chapter. To facilitate presentation, the reaction is divided into six categories defined by the structure of the precursor: (1) cyclization of divinyl and allyl vinyl ketones, (2) cyclization of silylated (stannylated) divinyl ketones, (3) in situ generation/cyclization of divinyl ketones or equivalents, (4) generation/cyclization of divinyl ketone equivalents by solvolysis, (5) alkyne‐based precursors of divinyl ketones, and (6) coupling reactions to form and cyclize divinyl ketones. The logic of this sequence follows from the order of decreasing structural similarity of the precursors to divinyl ketones. This is intended to be comprehensive in the coverage of cyclizations which produce 2‐cyclopentenones. The related electrocyclic closure of less oxidized pentadienylic cations is not covered. The reaction was most recently reviewed in 1991. Prior to that, the Nazarov cyclization had been reviewed in 1983 and also in the context of pentannulation.
Rund fiinfundzwanzig Jahre nach der Entdeckung einer sehr umfangreichen neuen Klasse von Reaktionen in der Organischen Chemie, die von Woodward und Hoffmann als ,,pericyclische Reaktionen" bezeichnet wurden, lassen jetzt quantenmechanische ab-initio-Rechnungen eine detaillierte Analyse der Geometrien, Energien und elektronischen Eigenschaften der Ubergangsstrukturen solcher Reaktionen zu. All diese Reaktionen weisen Gemeinsamkeiten auf, die es ermoglichen, Vorhersagen uber die Geometrien und Energien anderer Ubergangsstrukturen zu machen. Sie zeigen aber auch eine grol3e Vielfalt an Ubergangsstrukturen, von stark gebundenen, geschlossenschaligen bis hin zu schwach gebundenen, flexiblen mit Diradikalcharakter.
Twenty-five years after the discovery of a vast class of organic reactions named "pericyclic reactions" by Woodward and Hoffmann, ab initio quantum mechanics provides a detailed analysis of the geometries, energies, and electronic characteristics of the transition structures of these reactions. Common features are found in all these reactions, and generalizations permit prediction of other transition-structure geometries and energies. At the same time, great diversity is observed-from strongly bonded, rigid, closed-shell entities to weakly interacting, flexible diradical structures.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.