2022
DOI: 10.1080/03085147.2022.2030606
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon capital: The lexicon and allegories of US hydrocarbon finance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5 "Upstream" refers to oil and gas exploration and production. 6 See Field (2022b) for a full exploration of the valuation methods used by oil and gas financiers and experts in the US oil and gas industry. 7 Throughout the article I use the Penguin edition of Capital cited in the bibliography.…”
Section: Funding Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…5 "Upstream" refers to oil and gas exploration and production. 6 See Field (2022b) for a full exploration of the valuation methods used by oil and gas financiers and experts in the US oil and gas industry. 7 Throughout the article I use the Penguin edition of Capital cited in the bibliography.…”
Section: Funding Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then I asked Tom how the industry is changing and how calls to address climate change impact him and others. Reflecting, first, on the state of the US hydrocarbon industry in late 2019, he explained how "markets rewarded companies on the basis of how much acreage you control," describing a phase of the US "shale revolution," when investors clamored to buy proven but not yet producing unconventional oil and gas reserves (see Field, 2022aField, , 2022b In this phase, companies' worth was equated to the "net asset value" of their future expected hydrocarbon production. He continued, "The investment community equated acreage to value.…”
Section: Tom's Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is, in industry terms, a ‘highly prospective’ resource, meaning private companies have yet to ‘prove up’ its contents into ‘reserves’. In publicly staging its potential, proponents have not focused on factors that actually determine production feasibility – namely the price of bringing the resource to market (Field, 2022) – but instead broadcast employment and revenue estimates from maximised development scenarios. This was illustrated during a 2021 Senate inquiry conducted by the Australian Federal government, when a gas developer, national gas lobby, and the federal department of energy all quoted from the same private consulting report, claiming that ‘over 6,000 jobs’ and ‘as much as $17 billion’ in economic value could come from the field (APPEA, 2021, p. 2; Empire Energy, 2021, p. 2).…”
Section: Fostering An Old Frontiermentioning
confidence: 99%