2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon colonialism and the new land grab: Plantation forestry in Uganda and its livelihood impacts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
91
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 166 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
91
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Guidelines insist that A/R activities should be on degraded forest land [26], but the practice of labeling rich forest as degraded forest is widespread [75], with profoundly negative effects on social and ecological communities [28,39]. Increased deforestation beyond project boundaries is a recorded effect of forest-conversion for development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Guidelines insist that A/R activities should be on degraded forest land [26], but the practice of labeling rich forest as degraded forest is widespread [75], with profoundly negative effects on social and ecological communities [28,39]. Increased deforestation beyond project boundaries is a recorded effect of forest-conversion for development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In doing so, tree plantation developers that are able to invest in large-scale forestry can provide sustainable forest management and climate change mitigation [27]. In many cases, however, A/R projects are implemented in forested areas and follow the patterns of the global land grab crisis [5,28], in which small holders and indigenous people are violently dispossessed of their lands and livelihoods [29]. Case studies suggest that industrial forest plantations are neither more profitable [30], nor sequester more carbon than REDD+ or business as usual timber harvesting [31].…”
Section: Forest-centered Ccm: Redd+ and Forest Plantationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literature has also emerged outlining local level impacts of the expanding carbon economy, including injustice related to land tenure and access rights, as well as local natural resource rights, with indigenous and local communities especially impacted (Lyons and Westoby 2014;Mbatu 2016;Okereke and Dooley 2010;Schroeder and McDermott 2014;Suisseya and Caplow 2013). Literature also identifies the erosion of biodiversity, the militarization of conservation and associated violence by the state (Benjaminsen and Bryceson 2012;Bottazzi et al 2013;Büscher 2013;Cavanagh et al 2015;Fairhead et al 2012;German et al 2014;Martinello 2015;White et al 2012).…”
Section: Global Carbon Marketsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The socio-environmental justice movements demonstrate the compatibility between justice and degrowth by noting the need for rich countries to contain their ecological debts through having economic degrowth, which implies a lower social metabolism [27,119]. PES and REDD+, as designed, can be harmful instruments that can cause negative impacts to developing countries over the years [100] and still reinforce colonialism logic, i.e., when the Southern countries have their territories administered and dominated by the Northern powers, by a variation of traditional means [126,127].…”
Section: Relating Pes To Sources Of Degrowth: Highlighting the Tensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%