Scheschkewitz and Alabugin et al. suggest that photolysis under confinement in a crystalline matrix of 4,6-dimethyl-a-pyrone does not yield the crystal structure of 1,3-dimethylcyclobutadiene (Me 2 CBD) as we reported, but rather that of a 4,6-dimethyl-b-lactone intermediate. We provide arguments that the square-planar Me 2 CBD S /CO 2 complex and the rectangular-bent Me 2 CBD R molecule are stabilized under confinement by the guanidinium-sulfonate-calixarene host matrix used in our study. W e recently reported the single-crystal x-ray structure of 1,3-dimethylcyclobutadiene synthesized within a guanidinium-sulfonate-calixarene (G 4 C) crystalline matrix (1). Scheschkewitz (2) and Alabugin et al.(3) contend that our structures instead correspond with a bicyclic b-lactone intermediate. Our view on the importance of the quality of the x-ray data on structure resolution and the view of the Technical Comment authors coincide. In their comments, Scheschkewitz and Alabugin et al. consider our work as an unconvincing attempt, mainly due to the presumed poor quality of the experimental x-ray data. They fail, however, to place the crystallographic work in the particular context of highly advanced and challenging chemistry of unstable or reactive host-guest crystalline systems. A number of very comparable studies, albeit on other systems, have preceded our work (4-7), and the problems encountered are virtually the same as ours: resolved and unresolved disorder leading to results far from optimal data quality. Data and model quality are not expressed in a satisfactory way by just one or two numbers or parameters. Instead, a more or less complete set of parameters needs to be given to characterize the quality of data and model. Table S1 summarizes the different quality parameters for these very comparable studies (1, 4-7) in the field of reactive host-guest crystalline systems. Our data are no worse than these studies, if not better, and in all cases the conclusion would be that the data warrants the structural model described in the paper. Our opinion is that all previous important contributions related to unstable molecules sequestered in porous crystals can reach their full potential.The difficulties of experiments involving hostguest crystalline systems are related to the following factors: (i) in the case of nonreactive molecules (4, 5), the multiple orientations of the guest in a host cavity induce disorder; (ii) in the case of reactional processes, inconsistent diffusion of the reagents or unequal distribution of the irradiation energy over the whole volume of the crystal also leads to disorder (6, 7); and (iii) the preservation of the crystallinity of the hostmatrix may be affected during the reactional process by a loss of water or solvent molecules. All these factors lead to what is called "poor" data quality. Data quality can indeed lead to alternative interpretations, as illustrated by the comments of Scheschkewitz (2) and Alabugin et al. (3). However, we show below that our interpretation is more likely.Schesch...