2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2011.01.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon dioxide capture by absorption, challenges and possibilities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
90
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
90
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Typical concentration levels range between 12% and 14% for coal-fired boilers and integrated gasification combined cycles (IGCC), 11-13% for oil-fired boilers, 3-4% for gas turbines, and 7-10% for natural gas fired boilers [2]. It has been widely shown that cost-effective mitigation of CO 2 emissions from these electricity-generating sources can be accomplished by carbon capture and storage (CCS) [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] The separation of CO 2 from post-combustion flue gas can be conducted by various approaches, including physical/chemical absorption [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21], adsorption [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31], membrane separation [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44], and cryogenic distillation [45][46][47]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typical concentration levels range between 12% and 14% for coal-fired boilers and integrated gasification combined cycles (IGCC), 11-13% for oil-fired boilers, 3-4% for gas turbines, and 7-10% for natural gas fired boilers [2]. It has been widely shown that cost-effective mitigation of CO 2 emissions from these electricity-generating sources can be accomplished by carbon capture and storage (CCS) [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] The separation of CO 2 from post-combustion flue gas can be conducted by various approaches, including physical/chemical absorption [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21], adsorption [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31], membrane separation [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44], and cryogenic distillation [45][46][47]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For tertiary amines the energy requirement for stripping of CO2 can be lower than for secondary and primary amines because of lower heat of reaction, but may have a lower equilibrium temperature sensitivity increasing the demand for stripping steam, see (Svendsen et al 2011) and the absorption rate is also normally significant lower. An ideal amine system combines high absorption rate and cyclic capacity with low energy requirement for stripping and low degradation and corrosions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the operational level, Svendsen et al (2011) have identified two main drawbacks regarding post-combustion CO 2 capture. First, the high energy requirement for regenerating the amine solvent leads to a decrease by about 30 % of the plant efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%