2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.saa.2015.06.061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon dots preparation as a fluorescent sensing platform for highly efficient detection of Fe(III) ions in biological systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The higher values of 'K' and 'n' demonstrate a preferable interaction of the Au/Bi2S3@TiO2 NTAs and Fe 3+ ions [66] . The detection limit is 0.221 µM according to this formula (3σ/S), which is much lower than the ones found in literature, as shown in Table 1 [67][68][69][70] . Furthermore, the method of synthesizing fluorophores is simple and cheap compared to the previous methods [71][72][73][74] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…The higher values of 'K' and 'n' demonstrate a preferable interaction of the Au/Bi2S3@TiO2 NTAs and Fe 3+ ions [66] . The detection limit is 0.221 µM according to this formula (3σ/S), which is much lower than the ones found in literature, as shown in Table 1 [67][68][69][70] . Furthermore, the method of synthesizing fluorophores is simple and cheap compared to the previous methods [71][72][73][74] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…Moreover, the Stern‐Volmer plot showed a good linear range over the concentration of Fe 3+ , ranging from 2 to 6 μM (Figure B). The LOD was measured to be 0.62 μM having signal to noise ratio (S/N) of 3, while according to the U.S. environmental protection agency, the detection limit of Fe 3+ ion in drinking water is ∼ 5.357 μM, and also the calculated LOD was lower than those of earlier reported carbon‐based nanomaterials ( Table ) . In addition, we also compared the analytical performance of as‐synthesized GB‐CDs with other carbon dots, derived from natural resources (Table ) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LOD was measured to be 0.62 μM having signal to noise ratio (S/N) of 3, while according to the U.S. environmental protection agency, the detection limit of Fe 3 + ion in drinking water is ∼ 5.357 μM, [45] and also the calculated LOD was lower than those of earlier reported carbon-based nanomaterials ( Table 1). [46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54] In addition, we also compared the analytical performance of as-synthesized GB-CDs with other carbon dots, derived from natural resources ( Table 2). [55][56][57][58][59] Therefore, the proposed CDs could be promising nanoprobe for the detection of Fe 3 + ion.…”
Section: Selectivity Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 8,9 ] In recent years, carbon dots (C‐dots) have attracted tremendous attention due to their intriguing properties, including high photostability, low toxicity, better biocompatibility, eco‐friendly preparation as well as superior optical properties. [ 10 ] In addition, synthesis methods of C‐dots were straightforward, and the raw materials were readily available, such as graphene, [ 11 ] cyclodextrin, [ 12 ] and cellulose. [ 13 ] Based on these characteristics and advantages, the C‐dots absorbed into fluorescent materials was used for photocatalysis, [ 14 ] energy conversion, [ 15 ] cell imaging, [ 16 ] fluorescent detection, [ 17–19 ] and drug delivery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%