Carbon emission reduction of coal-fired power supply chain enterprises under the revenue sharing contract: Perspective of coordination game

Wang, Bangjun; Ji, Feng; Zheng, Jie; Xie, Kui; Feng, Zhaolei

doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105467

Cited by 56 publications

(26 citation statements)

References 60 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Van der Veen and Venugopal have shown that revenue sharing contracts could deliver a win-win situation for all the partners of supply chain [23]. Wang et al constructed a coordination game model of carbon emission reduction and analyzed the carbon emission reduction of the coal-fired power enterprises under the revenue sharing contract [2]. Liu put forward and analyzed four common cost-sharing models, and they utilized revenue sharing contract to coordinate supply chain by the proposed models [3].…”

Section: Supply Chain Coordination With Revenue Sharingmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Following the Copenhagen Conference in 2010, the lowcarbon economy has become a hot topic, and the low-carbon supply chain is the essential approach for enterprises to adopt the low-carbon economy [1]. Despite the fact that lowcarbon supply chains were just recently introduced to the academic community, they have gotten many interest conclusions [2,3].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Revenue Distribution Decision in Low-Carbon Supply Chain with Revenue Sharing Contract: An Analysis of the Third-Party Participation and GAHP

Yuan

Guo

et al. 2022

Mathematical Problems in Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Apart from the three revenue sharing parameters, the other parameters of the revenue sharing contract (RSC) in a low-carbon supply chain cannot be precise values in most cases. As a result, adopting the RSC will cause challenges in the low-carbon supply chain. In this paper, to calculate the value of the revenue distribution parameter, a decision method based on multiple index is put forward. First, we construct an index system of revenue distribution based on the viewpoints of cost, efficiency, and satisfaction. Second, we propose the third-party participation (TPP) mechanism and the group analytic hierarchy process (GAHP) decision-making approach according to the premise that “heteronomy is better than self-discipline.” By the use of the case of company “A,” we demonstrated the applicability and practicability of the decision-making approach. The main contributions of this paper are twofold. First, we surveyed 22 experts and set up the 43 indexes, while also constructing the analytical hierarchy process matrix and explaining each index in depth. Second, the TPP mechanism and the GAHP method are used to calculate the value of each index and their sensitivity to the decision-making by the software of Yaahp12.0. Overall, this research can help the decision-makers of low-carbon supply chain in determining the ratio of revenue distribution and improving the applicability of revenue sharing contract.

show abstract

Section: Supply Chain Coordination With Revenue Sharingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Revenue Distribution Decision in Low-Carbon Supply Chain with Revenue Sharing Contract: An Analysis of the Third-Party Participation and GAHP

Yuan

Guo

et al. 2022

Mathematical Problems in Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The inspection ability of the power grid material is weak, and the ability to swallow large-scale storage clusters has not been formed, which is not conducive to the intelligent deployment of power sources and the monitoring of equipment transportation. Based on the Stackelberg model framework, Wang et al (2021) [ 21 ] introduced the total carbon quota control and trading conditions of supply chain enterprises, constructed a carbon emission reduction coordination game model for coal-fired power supply chain enterprises, and designed a revenue-sharing coordination mechanism among supply chain enterprises. It is found that the coordinated development of the supply chain is an important step and link in the development of the carbon trading market, and it is also a necessary guarantee to implement the overall goal of carbon emission reduction in China.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Influencing Factors and Realization Path of Power Decarbonization—Based on Panel Data Analysis of 30 Provinces in China from 2011 to 2019

Ren

Zhang

Fan

2022

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

2011–2019 was the critical period of the low-carbon transformation of the power industry, reflecting the deepening influence of market mechanisms. Decarbonization of the new power system is a systematic project that needs to strengthen the top-level design and overall planning. Therefore, the paper first evaluates the decarbonization of the existing power system and controls the grid architecture, power structure, energy utilization, supply chain, and trading market to further optimize the system by strengthening the basic theoretical research of the new power system, exploring the key elements of the low-carbon development of the power system, promoting the breakthrough of the key subjects, and formulating the new power system decarbonization path. In the international push for carbon neutrality goals, identifying key factors in the decarbonization of the power system is critical to achieving low-carbon development in the power sector. Combined with the characteristics and development trends of the power industry, the five dimensions of “Power generation decarbonization (SP)”, “Energy utilization efficiency (EU)”, “Supply chain decarbonization (SC)”, and “Power grid decarbonization (PG)”, and “the Trading system (TS)” are selected to construct an evaluation index system for the power decarbonization and identify the key factors. The Analytic Network Process (ANP) Method is used to calculate the index weight and measure the decarbonization level of the power industry in 30 provinces in China from 2011 to 2019. The evaluation results reveal that the overall decarbonization level of the power industry is on the rise and has stabilized after peaking in 2016. The regression results of the systematic GMM estimation show that “the intensity of cross-regional transmission”, “the degree of carbon market participation”, “technology innovation”, and “policy support” can significantly promote power decarbonization, and different regions have heterogeneity. Therefore, we propose to achieve technological innovation and upgrading in the eastern region, strengthen the construction of smart grids in the central region, optimize the power structure in the western region, and improve the market mechanism as a whole, to form a low-carbon development path for the power industry.

show abstract

“…Revenue‐sharing contract plays a prominent role in coordinating the profit distribution of upstream and downstream enterprises in the supply chain and realizing the overall optimization of the supply chain (Song & Gao, 2018). The supply chain coordination problem of the use of the revenue‐sharing contract has been extensively studied in academia (Canbulut et al, 2021; Liu et al, 2020; Wang, Ji, et al, 2021; Zhao et al, 2021). For the coordination of capital‐constrained supply chains, the revenue‐sharing contract also performs very well.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Joint coordination contract for capital‐constrained supply chains under asymmetric information

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A two‐echelon supply chain considering capital constraints and asymmetric information is established. The supplier provides credit guarantees for the capital‐constrained retailer to loan from the bank, and its information about the retailer's capital type is asymmetric. The equilibrium decisions of supply chain participants are analyzed by using the Stackelberg game theory and principal–agent theory. Then, a joint contract is designed to eliminate the double marginalization effect. The results show that the supplier and the bank make different decisions for different types of retailers to avoid adverse selection. The joint contract of revenue‐sharing and transfer payment can coordinate the supply chain.

show abstract

Carbon emission reduction of coal-fired power supply chain enterprises under the revenue sharing contract: Perspective of coordination game

Cited by 56 publications

References 60 publications

Revenue Distribution Decision in Low-Carbon Supply Chain with Revenue Sharing Contract: An Analysis of the Third-Party Participation and GAHP

Revenue Distribution Decision in Low-Carbon Supply Chain with Revenue Sharing Contract: An Analysis of the Third-Party Participation and GAHP

Influencing Factors and Realization Path of Power Decarbonization—Based on Panel Data Analysis of 30 Provinces in China from 2011 to 2019

Joint coordination contract for capital‐constrained supply chains under asymmetric information

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About