2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon emissions reduction in tobacco primary processing line: A case study in China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They found that the LCT effect of high-carbon state-owned firms is not obvious. Based on scenario analysis, Wang et al [ 57 ] compared the LCT potential of three tobacco companies through process optimization and product structure upgrades, and finally provided recommendations. By empirical research, Li [ 58 ] discovered that 30 per cent of power firms in China have high LCT efficiency.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found that the LCT effect of high-carbon state-owned firms is not obvious. Based on scenario analysis, Wang et al [ 57 ] compared the LCT potential of three tobacco companies through process optimization and product structure upgrades, and finally provided recommendations. By empirical research, Li [ 58 ] discovered that 30 per cent of power firms in China have high LCT efficiency.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li et al (2017) analyzed the carbon footprint of the manufacturing section of a domestic brand of cigarette based on the LCA method. Wang et al (2018) developed a comprehensive energy consumption model to provide a theoretical basis for reducing emissions in the cigarette yarn-making section. No carbon footprint studies have been reported for tobacco growing, which is an important stage of tobacco production.…”
Section: Carbon Footprint Of Tobacco Production In Chinamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two scenarios were created to replace the initial embodied carbon by modifying two variables within the system framework. The results demonstrated that increasing prefabrication rates and adopting low‐carbon materials would significantly reduce carbon emissions (Wang et al., 2021).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%