2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2006.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon fluxes in soil food webs of increasing complexity revealed by 14C labelling and 13C natural abundance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
61
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This agrees with our hypothesis that P. armata would derive more of it resources from roots than the two other species because it can feed directly on roots. Our finding that the rhizosphere channel was the main supplier of energy in the soil food web is in line with previous findings (Garrett et al 2001;Pelz et al 2005;Ruf et al 2006). However, the large loss of LGM-C at the beginning of the experiment indicates that LGM-C was very important for fuelling the microbial mediated release of mineral N and subsequent plant growth.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This agrees with our hypothesis that P. armata would derive more of it resources from roots than the two other species because it can feed directly on roots. Our finding that the rhizosphere channel was the main supplier of energy in the soil food web is in line with previous findings (Garrett et al 2001;Pelz et al 2005;Ruf et al 2006). However, the large loss of LGM-C at the beginning of the experiment indicates that LGM-C was very important for fuelling the microbial mediated release of mineral N and subsequent plant growth.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Based on the importance for utilization by soil microbes, there are three main carbon sources in forest ecosystems: plant root exudates, litter, and soil organic matter (Ruf et al 2006). As a result, either understory or litter is of paramount importance to maintain a large amount of soil microbe biomass.…”
Section: Effects Of Understory Removal On Soil Physical and Chemical mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Litter cover acts as a protective layer for maintaining soil physical properties, like retention for soil moisture (Ginter et al 1979), buffering against soil temperature and compaction change (MacKinney 1929), and soil conservation from erosion or leaching (Geddes and Dunkerley 1999;Mo et al 2003). Litter also provides habitats and substrates for soil fauna (Attignon et al 2004) and microorganisms (Ruf et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, soil quality can be assessed by physical, chemical and microbiological properties of soil together with the abundance and diversity of edaphic fauna (nematodes, Acari, Collembola, Symphyla, Chilopoda, Pauropoda, enchytraeids, earthworms); furthermore, the determination of community structure adds significant information on the soil status (Cole et al, 2006;De Goede and Brussard, 2002;Duelli and Obrist, 2003;Menta et al, 2008;van Straalen, 1998;Yan et al, 2012). In a well-balanced soil, mesofauna is highly biodiversified and occupies all trophic levels within the soil food webs (Ruf et al, 2006). Therefore, the loss of mesofauna diversity is a negative consequence on soil biota, since it is involved in fundamental ecosystem services such as nutrient cyclings Narula et al, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%