2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.promfg.2016.12.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon Footprint Analysis of Fibre Reinforced Composite Recycling Processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, the environmental impact of chemical recycling remains questionable. 55 Nevertheless, the concept of chemical recycling remains promising, provided that future research efforts focus on methods that are energy-efficient and produce organic components that can easily be reclaimed from the selected solvent. This topic and the, mainly academic, progress made so far is further discussed in the next chapter.…”
Section: Recycling Of Conventional Thermoset Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the environmental impact of chemical recycling remains questionable. 55 Nevertheless, the concept of chemical recycling remains promising, provided that future research efforts focus on methods that are energy-efficient and produce organic components that can easily be reclaimed from the selected solvent. This topic and the, mainly academic, progress made so far is further discussed in the next chapter.…”
Section: Recycling Of Conventional Thermoset Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cracking of the thermoset matrix, mostly flexible or rigid foam mixtures, produces a polyol which can be reintroduced into the PU raw material cycle. An issue is that the separation of organic substances from the solvent requires a lot of energy and that the frequent use of hazardous solvents makes the impact of chemical recycling questionable (Shuaib and Mativenga, 2017…”
Section: Recycling Of Thermoset Materials and Compositesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ook onderscheiden chemisch recyclen en thermisch verwerken zich van verbranden (met of zonder energieterugwinning) omdat hierbij het kunststofafval wordt omgezet in kooldioxide (CO 2 ) en waterdamp. De moeite die verricht moet worden voor het recyclen is bij chemisch recyclen en thermisch verwerken navenant groter dan bij mechanisch recyclen, wat vaak tot uitdrukking komt in hoger energiegebruik, hogere verwerkingstarieven en lagere potentiële milieuwinsten [Shuaib et al 2017, Broeren et al 2018]. Daar staat een intrinsiek voordeel tegenover dat opgenomen verontreinigingen kunnen worden verwijderd.…”
Section: Soort Verpakkingen Gemiddeld Vocht-en Vuilgehalte [%]unclassified