2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2010.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon footprints of Indian food items

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
95
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 187 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
5
95
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This fact is supported by PATHAK et al, 2010, who stated that changes in eating habits could improve GHG mitigation.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 52%
“…This fact is supported by PATHAK et al, 2010, who stated that changes in eating habits could improve GHG mitigation.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Hence, they could not address effectively the diet-related preferences. Pathak et al (2010) calculated the carbon footprints of Indian food items, taking into account cultivation of crops, processing, transportation, and kitchen preparations. The average emission factors they used did not address CH 4 emissions from non-rice crops, different management conditions, and changes in soil carbon.…”
Section: Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, it is argued that reducing animal protein consumption can bring down GHGs emission. Pathak et al (2010) evaluated GHGs emission from 24 Indian food items and observed that animal food products and rice cultivation mostly contributed to methane emission, food products from crops contributed to emission of nitrous oxide while farm operations, production of farm inputs, transport, processing and preparation of food contributed to the emission of carbon dioxide. They showed that animal products such as meat and milk have higher emission than crop products such as chapatti and vegetables.…”
Section: Greenhouse Gas Emission and Food Consumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%