accessible lithium reserves are in remote or in politically sensitive areas. [5] This fact should sound the alarm for the expanded application of LIBs, because the increasing demand for LIBs could cause the price of lithium to skyrocket. It is even predicted that the world will run out of lithium supplies in the foreseeable future. [6][7][8] It is well known that sodium resources are more abundant (abundance: 23.6 × 10 3 mg kg −1 vs 20 mg kg −1 ) and vast (for example, the United States alone possesses 23 billion tons of soda ash which is a sodium-containing precursor) than lithium analog. Additionally, the trona (about $135-165 per ton), which could be used to produce sodium carbonate, has much lower cost than lithium carbonate (about $5000 per ton in 2010). [9,10] These two features endow SIBs with fascinating advantages for large-scale EES applications in the near future. Without doubt, SIBs also face big challenges: performance improvement and technological innovation. Although sodium has similar physical and chemical properties to lithium, the larger ionic radius of sodium ions compared with that of lithium ions restricts the insertion and extraction of sodium ions from the host materials commonly explored for LIBs. To address this problem, optimizing the chemical composition, tailoring the lattice structures, and regulating the morphologies of the host materials seem to be the most applicable strategies, and there have already been several excellent reviews. [11][12][13][14][15][16] As for technological innovation, the traditional fabrication processes mainly based on the slurrycasting method not only make SIBs typically rigid, thick, bulky, and heavy, but also reduce the overall volumetric/gravimetric energy density of the electrode. In the traditional slurry-casting method, the binders are insulating and electrochemically inactive, which can not only decrease the electrical conductivity, but also has a detrimental effect on the cycling stability resulting from some side effects between the electrolyte and inactive materials. In addition, the heavy weight of the binders, conductive additives and current collectors also reduces the volumetric/ gravimetric energy density of the overall electrode. Therefore, to enhance the battery performance and simplify the preparation process, the traditional slurry-casting method should be improved or even replaced; in other words, avoiding the use of binder, conductive additive, and metal current collector.In contrast, flexible electrodes are usually made from various active materials built on flexible conductive substrates without binder, conductive additive, and even metal current collector,
Sodium-Ion Batteries