2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jglr.2010.11.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus loadings from tilapia fish cages in Lake Malawi and factors influencing their magnitude

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Estimates from aquaculture production records indicate that 71% to 88% of nutrients added through feed to fish cages in Lake Malawi are lost into the surrounding environment from fish cages. The amount of nutrients discharged from the fish cages are directly proportional to the amount of feed used so that as the fish farming expands, the levels of nutrients discharged may exceed levels observed in major rivers draining into the lake (Gondwe et al, 2011). Similar losses of between 70% and 80% C, N and P have been reported from temperate cages by Gowen and Bradbury (1987), Holby and Hall (1991), Hall et al (1990Hall et al ( , 1992 and Kaushik (1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Estimates from aquaculture production records indicate that 71% to 88% of nutrients added through feed to fish cages in Lake Malawi are lost into the surrounding environment from fish cages. The amount of nutrients discharged from the fish cages are directly proportional to the amount of feed used so that as the fish farming expands, the levels of nutrients discharged may exceed levels observed in major rivers draining into the lake (Gondwe et al, 2011). Similar losses of between 70% and 80% C, N and P have been reported from temperate cages by Gowen and Bradbury (1987), Holby and Hall (1991), Hall et al (1990Hall et al ( , 1992 and Kaushik (1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…The recent development of intensive cage aquaculture in the shallow southeast arm represents a new source of nutrients to Lake Malawi which may also accelerate eutrophication. Gondwe et al (2011) demonstrate that the establishment of cage culture in the lake can be a significant source of C, N and P nutrients into the lake's epilimnion. Estimates from aquaculture production records indicate that 71% to 88% of nutrients added through feed to fish cages in Lake Malawi are lost into the surrounding environment from fish cages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Gondwe et al (2011) observed that nutrient losses from cages to the surrounding environment in the order of 81-91% for C, 59-80% for N and 85-92% for p, indicating the importance of cage aquaculture as a new source of nutrients, not only locally, but on a lake-wide basis, may stimulate microbial populations. As a consequence, the quality of commercialised fish can be committed due to the high contamination of pathogenic bacteria or saprophytic bacteria that accelerates the deterioration process of the fish.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main impacts related to aquaculture in rivers, lakes, and reservoirs are associated to the increased flow of particles and dissolved nutrients in the environment (Sugiura et al, 2006;Azevedo et al, 2011;Gondwe et al, 2011;Canale et al, 2016); the mortality and loss of biodiversity of fishes (Sang, 2006); the contamination by chemical compounds (through the use of antibiotics, antiparasitics, anesthetics, and disinfectants) (Burridge et al, 2010); the lower dissolved oxygen concentrations (Hamblin & Gale, 2002); the occurrence of harmful algal blooms (Sowles, 2009); and the increase in the contents of organic matter and metals in the sediment (Xia et al, 2016). In addition to these factors, the following were observed: changes in the biodiversity of the microflora and benthic sediments (Buschmann et al, 2009); changes in the trophic structure and biological attributes of the diet of wild fishes due to the introduction of exotic species from aquaculture (Arthur et al, 2010;Carvalho et al, 2012;Ramos et al, 2014); dissemination of diseases that may affect wild populations of aquatic organisms (Israel, 2007); and, in some cases, direct conflicts with other users of water resources, which can cause adverse social effects (Béné & Obirih-Opareh, 2009).…”
Section: Environmental Impact Of Aquaculture In Lakes and Reservoirsmentioning
confidence: 99%