2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2020.03.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon-resistant NiO-Y2O3-nanostructured catalysts derived from double-layered hydroxides for dry reforming of methane

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An observable weight increase occurred at temperatures from approximately 200 • C to 400 • C for all the used catalysts due to the oxidation of Ni to NiO [50], while the weight loss starting from 400 • C was assigned to the gasification of the coke deposited after the CDR reaction. As shown in Figure 6, a slight weight loss about ~1.4-1.7% was obtained for the used Ni-C/Q-10 and Ni-G/Q-10 after 20 h CDR testing, and it was significantly lower than that of the used Ni/Q-10 (3.1%), which is significantly lower than the weight loss of the reference reports [51,52]. These results showed that the coke deposition was significantly reduced by adding complexing agent, which was attributed to its smaller Ni particle sizes (Figure 2 and Table 1) leading to a high stability of CDR (Figure 4).…”
Section: Characterization Of Used Catalystsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…An observable weight increase occurred at temperatures from approximately 200 • C to 400 • C for all the used catalysts due to the oxidation of Ni to NiO [50], while the weight loss starting from 400 • C was assigned to the gasification of the coke deposited after the CDR reaction. As shown in Figure 6, a slight weight loss about ~1.4-1.7% was obtained for the used Ni-C/Q-10 and Ni-G/Q-10 after 20 h CDR testing, and it was significantly lower than that of the used Ni/Q-10 (3.1%), which is significantly lower than the weight loss of the reference reports [51,52]. These results showed that the coke deposition was significantly reduced by adding complexing agent, which was attributed to its smaller Ni particle sizes (Figure 2 and Table 1) leading to a high stability of CDR (Figure 4).…”
Section: Characterization Of Used Catalystsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The peaks at 1350 cm −1 (D band) and 1600 cm −1 (G band) represent two different kinds of carbon. And D band is mostly sp 3 hybrid carbon, belonging to the disordered aromatic structure, while G band is mostly sp 2 hybrid carbon, belonging to stretching vibrations in the aromatic layers of graphite [40] . The carbon deposition type on the catalyst surface was evaluated by I D / I G values, and I D and I G values corresponded to Raman peak intensity of D‐band and G‐band, respectively [41] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And D band is mostly sp 3 hybrid carbon, belonging to the disordered aromatic structure, while G band is mostly sp 2 hybrid carbon, belonging to stretching vibrations in the aromatic layers of graphite. [40] The carbon deposition type on the catalyst surface was evaluated by I D / I G values, and I D and I G values corresponded to Raman peak intensity of D-band and Gband, respectively. [41] The value of the I D / I G increase in the order of: Ni/MgO < Ni/MgO@Al0.6 < Ni@Al 2 O 3 .…”
Section: Analysis Of Catalysts Deactivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to improve the catalytic performance, various catalytic additives, such as alkaline earth metal oxides, and rare-earth metal oxides, have been extensively investigated toward CRM reaction (Swirk et al, 2020). Meanwhile, doping promoters can also improve the stability of the catalyst by enhancing the surface basicity, redox property, and pore structure of the catalyst by intensifying the coke eliminating process (Singha et al, 2016).…”
Section: Ni-based Catalyst Modified With Different Additivesmentioning
confidence: 99%