2016
DOI: 10.1039/c6ra06833b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon rings: a DFT study on geometry, aromaticity, intermolecular carbon–carbon interactions and stability

Abstract: Strong complimentary electrostatic interactions lead to large number of C⋯C interactions in doubly antiaromatic C4N dimers while the delocalized system of π electrons in doubly aromatic C4N+2 dimers suggest very few intermolecular C⋯C interactions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
44
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
2
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main question that evolved to a controversy by conflicting theoretical studies was on the bonding pattern of C 18 : is it polyynic with altering triple and single bonds, or cumulenic with equal bond lengths? Pure and hybrid DFT [19][20][21] as well as MP2 22,23 calculations predict cumulenic structures, whereas HF, 14,24 quantum Monte Carlo 25 and CCSD 26 calculations predict polyynic geometries. Further studies diagnosed that the DFT calculated bonding pattern depends on the amount of HF exchange of the hybrid functional, 27,28 whereas range-separated exchange nonempirical DFT schemes provide polyynic structures regardless of the type of functional that is used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main question that evolved to a controversy by conflicting theoretical studies was on the bonding pattern of C 18 : is it polyynic with altering triple and single bonds, or cumulenic with equal bond lengths? Pure and hybrid DFT [19][20][21] as well as MP2 22,23 calculations predict cumulenic structures, whereas HF, 14,24 quantum Monte Carlo 25 and CCSD 26 calculations predict polyynic geometries. Further studies diagnosed that the DFT calculated bonding pattern depends on the amount of HF exchange of the hybrid functional, 27,28 whereas range-separated exchange nonempirical DFT schemes provide polyynic structures regardless of the type of functional that is used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A previous benchmark study by Remya and Suresh on a variety of non‐covalent dimers using around 380 different DFT methods yielded M06L as the most reliable for geometry and interaction energy close to the CCSD(T) level accuracy. Recent studies conducted with M06L functional (the meta‐GGA local functional with 0% Hartree–Fock exchange) on a variety of systems have given reliable results in agreement with high accuracy ab initio methods and dispersion‐corrected DFT methods . The wavefunction generated at M06L/6–311++G(d,p) is used for molecular electrostatic potential (MESP) calculation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Recent studies conducted with M06L functional (the meta-GGA local functional with 0% Hartree-Fock exchange [50] ) on a variety of systems have given reliable results in agreement with high accuracy ab initio methods and dispersion-corrected DFT methods. [51][52][53] The wavefunction generated at M06L/6-31111G(d,p) is used for molecular electrostatic potential (MESP) calculation. For all the molecules, aromaticity of each ring is quantified by computing the z component of the nucleus independent chemical shift at 1 Å above the ring centre (NICS(1) zz ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MESP analysis is an important method that has been used to understand several chemical phenomena, such as intermolecular interactions, and various chemical properties, such as bonding, chemical reactivity, inductive effect, and resonance. In addition to the application of MESP analysis to study various chemical properties, it has also been used to predict the reduction potential of compounds …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two technically slightly different free energy cycles 1 and 2, as shown in Figure 2, are used for the calculation of the reduction potential of the complexes. In addition, the electron affinity (EA) and molecular electrostatic potential (MESP) of the tris(β-diketonato)iron(III) complexes are presented on a quantum chemistry level, to obtain better insight into the observed experimental redox behavior of complexes [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] ( Figure 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%