2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10457-019-00450-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon sequestration in an agroforestry system of coffee with rubber trees compared to open-grown coffee in southern Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
16
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
4
16
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Residues that are rich in N are thought to enhance the C use efficiency of decomposer organisms [60,61], resulting in a higher microbial biomass [60] and eventual stabilization of SOC. Our findings thus lend support to the potential role of agroforestry systems for sequestering C and supporting overall soil fertility in agricultural lands [24,25].…”
Section: Soil Chemical and Physical Properties Across Different Land Usessupporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Residues that are rich in N are thought to enhance the C use efficiency of decomposer organisms [60,61], resulting in a higher microbial biomass [60] and eventual stabilization of SOC. Our findings thus lend support to the potential role of agroforestry systems for sequestering C and supporting overall soil fertility in agricultural lands [24,25].…”
Section: Soil Chemical and Physical Properties Across Different Land Usessupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Practices associated with mixed agroforestry systems, such as the inclusion of vegetation that is structurally and taxonomically diverse, as well as continuous soil cover, are often associated with soil biological activity, including enhanced abundance and diversity of soil macrofauna [21,22]. Additionally, agroforestry systems can contribute to C sequestration in agricultural lands via storage of C in tree biomass and SOM [23][24][25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results regarding the total SOC storage in OP were similar to the carbon storage reported by Zaro et al (2020) in a coffee with rubber tree agroforestry system in Brazil; this author obtained 20% less SOC storage at a depth of 0-70 cm. Such comparisons only are illustrative of potential discrepancies among various alternative land uses.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Los resultados de COS en la línea base fueron superiores a los que obtuvieron Balaba Tumwebaze y Byakagaba (2016) en sistemas agroforestales de café (54,01 t ha -1 ) en un clima semicálido húmedo de Uganda. Pero fueron inferiores con los datos que reportaron Zaro et al (2020), quienes encontraron que los suelos de algunos sistemas cafetaleros de Brasil almacenaron alrededor de 195,60 t ha -1 de C. También fueron inferiores a los resultados generados por Chatterjee et al (2020), en sistemas cafetaleros bajo sombra de Costa Rica que almacenaron hasta 146,6 t ha -1 de C. El COS que se encontró en este estudio diferió con los resultados obtenidos por Chatterjee et al (2020), Balaba Tumwebaze y Byakagaba (2016) y Zaro et al (2020), debido a que las tipologías de los suelos fueron diferentes en cada región, además de que la influencia del clima y el manejo agronómico del sistema fueron determinantes en las reservas de COS (Jansson & Hofmockel, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified