2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon sequestration potential of forest land: Management for products and bioenergy versus preservation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is claimed that the most efficient carbon mitigation policy from a forest biomass point of view is to log productive forests at optimum age classes in order to substitute more energy intensive materials (Marland and Marland, 1992;Marland and Schlamadinger, 1997;Solberg, 1997;Perez-Garcia et al, 2005;Raymer et al, 2009;Pingoud et al, 2010;Sathre and O'Connor, 2010). The largest carbon pools are achieved when forest management is made in consideration with long lived products (Deusen, 2010). Long lived products can be cascaded into other materials that further substitute energy demanding materials and finally into energy and fuels.…”
Section: Reasons For Variations In Climate Change Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It is claimed that the most efficient carbon mitigation policy from a forest biomass point of view is to log productive forests at optimum age classes in order to substitute more energy intensive materials (Marland and Marland, 1992;Marland and Schlamadinger, 1997;Solberg, 1997;Perez-Garcia et al, 2005;Raymer et al, 2009;Pingoud et al, 2010;Sathre and O'Connor, 2010). The largest carbon pools are achieved when forest management is made in consideration with long lived products (Deusen, 2010). Long lived products can be cascaded into other materials that further substitute energy demanding materials and finally into energy and fuels.…”
Section: Reasons For Variations In Climate Change Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In fact, forest biomass that is currently used for energy frequently comes from material that would decay quickly if left in the forest (e.g., logging residues) [17]. Thus, forests that are managed for biomass alone or managed for both conventional wood products and biomass co-products may result in climate benefits [18,19]. Potential residue feedstocks include limbs and tops, small-diameter trees, downed logs, stumps, shrubs and litter/duff material that would otherwise remain in the forest after a timber harvest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forest inventory information such as diameter at breast height (DBH), tree height (h), species, basal area and volume are critical to assessing the potential of wild fire hazard [1], obtaining and validating aboveground biomass, calculating forest ecosystem services and assessing carbon sequestration strategies for sustainable management [2][3][4]. Forest inventory has facilitated studies and research not only regarding the economic aspects of forest management, such as timber product sale or revenue earnings [5]; but also the ecological aspects including wildlife habitat [6,7], forest stability, ecosystem services [8,9] and natural biodiversity conservation [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%