2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2005.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon stocks and timber yield in two boreal forest ecosystems under current and changing climatic conditions subjected to varying management regimes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The concurrent analyses of energy biomass, timber and carbon stocks showed that an increase in these parameters was possible during the second period , in which they increased with increased basal area thinning thresholds. In the case of timber and carbon, this is in good agreement with the findings of Briceño-Elizondo et al (2006), Garcia-Gonzalo et al (2007), and Thornley and Cannell (2000), who concluded that management with higher tree stocking, but also with continuous canopy cover and fewer disturbances throughout the rotation could give maximum production of timber and carbon stocks. How-────────────────────────── ever, Seely et al (2002) suggested a trade-off between ecosystem carbon storage capacity and timber production, which was found also in this study during the first and last periods.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The concurrent analyses of energy biomass, timber and carbon stocks showed that an increase in these parameters was possible during the second period , in which they increased with increased basal area thinning thresholds. In the case of timber and carbon, this is in good agreement with the findings of Briceño-Elizondo et al (2006), Garcia-Gonzalo et al (2007), and Thornley and Cannell (2000), who concluded that management with higher tree stocking, but also with continuous canopy cover and fewer disturbances throughout the rotation could give maximum production of timber and carbon stocks. How-────────────────────────── ever, Seely et al (2002) suggested a trade-off between ecosystem carbon storage capacity and timber production, which was found also in this study during the first and last periods.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Climate change enhanced stocks more in the north than the south. The results indicated that carbon sequestration in the ecosystem may be enhanced with no loss in timber production (Briceño-Elizondo et al 2006a). According to Briceño-Elizondo et al (2006b), thinning regimes that increased mean stocking over the rotation all increased total growth and timber yield, regardless of tree species and site.…”
Section: Adaptive Forest Management Maymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Jedoch müssen Auswahl und Mischung der Baumarten regional betrachtet werden. Standortbedingungen, der projizierte regionale Klimawandel und die Reaktion der einzelnen Arten darauf müssen berücksichtigt werden (Temperli et al 2012 (Alam et al 2008;Garcia-Gonzalo et al 2007;Briceño-Elizondo et al 2006). Da Anpassungsplanungen im forstlichen Bereich langfristige Konsequenzen haben, ist eine fortlaufende, kritische Überprüfung der gewonnenen Erkenntnisse auf der Grundlage neuer Ergebnisse der Klimaforschung mit mehreren und neueren Modell-und Szenarienensembles unabdingbar (Krug et al 2010a).…”
Section: Anpassung In Der Forstwirtschaftunclassified