& Context Projecting changes in forest productivity in Europe is crucial for adapting forest management to changing environmental conditions. & Aims The objective of this paper is to project forest productivity changes under different climate change scenarios at a large number of sites in Europe with a stand-scale processbased model. & Methods We applied the process-based forest growth model 4C at 132 typical forest sites of important European tree species in ten environmental zones using climate change scenarios from three different climate models and two different assumptions about CO 2 effects on productivity. & Results This paper shows that future forest productivity will be affected by climate change and that these effects depend strongly on the climate scenario used and the persistence of CO 2 effects. We find that productivity increases in Northern Europe, increases or decreases in Central Europe, and decreases in Southern Europe. This geographical pattern is mirrored by the responses of the individual tree species. The productivity of Scots pine and Norway spruce, mostly located in central and northern Europe, increases while the productivity of Common beech and oak in southern regions decreases. It is important to note that we consider the physiological response to climate change excluding disturbances or management. & Conclusions Different climate change scenarios and assumptions about the persistence of CO 2 effects lead to uncertain projections of future forest productivity. These uncertainties need to be integrated into forest management planning and adaptation of forest management to climate change using adaptive management frameworks. Keywords 4C (FORESEE). CO 2 effects. Environmental change. Level-II plots. Process-based modelling. Uncertainties

No abstract

Abstract. Process-based vegetation models are widely used to predict local and global ecosystem dynamics and climate change impacts. Due to their complexity, they require careful parameterization and evaluation to ensure that projections are accurate and reliable. The PROFOUND Database (PROFOUND DB) provides a wide range of empirical data on European forests to calibrate and evaluate vegetation models that simulate climate impacts at the forest stand scale. A particular advantage of this database is its wide coverage of multiple data sources at different hierarchical and temporal scales, together with environmental driving data as well as the latest climate scenarios. Specifically, the PROFOUND DB provides general site descriptions, soil, climate, CO2, nitrogen deposition, tree and forest stand level, and remote sensing data for nine contrasting forest stands distributed across Europe. Moreover, for a subset of five sites, time series of carbon fluxes, atmospheric heat conduction and soil water are also available. The climate and nitrogen deposition data contain several datasets for the historic period and a wide range of future climate change scenarios following the Representative Concentration Pathways (RCP2.6, RCP4.5, RCP6.0, RCP8.5). We also provide pre-industrial climate simulations that allow for model runs aimed at disentangling the contribution of climate change to observed forest productivity changes. The PROFOUND DB is available freely as a “SQLite” relational database or “ASCII” flat file version (at https://doi.org/10.5880/PIK.2020.006/; Reyer et al., 2020). The data policies of the individual contributing datasets are provided in the metadata of each data file. The PROFOUND DB can also be accessed via the ProfoundData R package (https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ProfoundData; Silveyra Gonzalez et al., 2020), which provides basic functions to explore, plot and extract the data for model set-up, calibration and evaluation.

Forest models are widely used to assess the impacts of changing environmental conditions such as climate, atmospheric CO 2 concentration and nitrogen deposition on forest functioning, dynamics and structure (e.g., Reyer et al., 2013). Yet, because of our incomplete understanding of forest ecosystems and computational constraints, these models differ in the way specific processes are represented, leading to differences in their predictions (Bugmann et al., 2019;Collalti et al., 2019;Huber et al., 2021). Hence, models need to be comprehensively evaluated using different data types at different spatio-temporal scales before we can judge their structural uncertainties and suitability for answering specific questions (Marechaux et al., 2021;Oberpriller et al., 2021).Model simulations need to be in adequate agreement with independent observations. Moreover, models have to be sensitive to environmental drivers to ensure that system responses are realistically predicted under a wide range of environmental and climatic