2020
DOI: 10.1002/vzj2.20021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon turnover and microbial activity in an artificial soil under imposed cyclic drainage and imbibition

Abstract: Water table fluctuations generate temporally and spatially dynamic physicochemical conditions that drive biogeochemical hot spots and hot moments in the vadose zone. However, their role in the cycling of soil C remains poorly known. Here, we present results from unvegetated column experiments filled with 45 cm of artificial soil containing 10% humus, and inoculated with a natural microbial extract. In one series of three replicate columns, five cycles, each consisting of a 4-wk drainage followed by a 4-wk imbi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The general, qualitative conclusions from our analysis should be transferable to other microbial reaction systems in environmental settings. Soils, for instance, are a very dynamic environment where redox conditions can change abruptly through changes in hydrological conditions like drainage or flooding (Pronk et al., 2020; Zhang & Furman, 2021). Such short‐term fluctuations will lead to a disconnect of quickly reacting transcript concentrations from enzyme concentrations and, consequently, reaction rates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The general, qualitative conclusions from our analysis should be transferable to other microbial reaction systems in environmental settings. Soils, for instance, are a very dynamic environment where redox conditions can change abruptly through changes in hydrological conditions like drainage or flooding (Pronk et al., 2020; Zhang & Furman, 2021). Such short‐term fluctuations will lead to a disconnect of quickly reacting transcript concentrations from enzyme concentrations and, consequently, reaction rates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of previous experiments have assessed impacts of fluctuating oxic/anoxic conditions on microbial community composition ( Pett-Ridge and Firestone, 2005 ; DeAngelis et al, 2010 ; Frindte et al, 2016 ; Mejia et al, 2016 ; Randle-Boggis et al, 2018 ; Winkler et al, 2019 ; Pronk et al, 2020 ) but it was often difficult to discern whether increasing the relative durations of anoxic vs. oxic periods caused systematic changes, and whether these differences were sustained over time. Here, our treatments corresponded to cumulative anoxic durations of 0, 33, 50, 66, and 75% of the experiment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bacterial communities incubated under 5-week anoxic/1-week oxic cycles for 1 y diverged from initial conditions in one rice paddy soil but not another ( Winkler et al, 2019 ). Bacteria exposed to 4-week drained and flooded cycles in a synthetic soil did not differ from a static control ( Pronk et al, 2020 ), but repeated 2-week flooding events altered pasture soil communities ( Randle-Boggis et al, 2018 ). Overall, responses of soil microbial communities to experimental manipulations of O 2 availability have been mixed, and it is not clear whether community responses to cyclic anoxic events of increasing duration are generally consistent within or among soils.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, many environments in which nitrogen cycling plays a crucial role are very dynamic. For example, rapid watercontent driven changes in the redox state of soils (Pronk et al, 2020) or diurnal fluctuations in river biogeochemistry (Kunz et al, 2017) can control nitrogen turnover. The lack of obvious correlations between transcripts of functional genes and reaction rates observed in our modeling results are likely representative for such dynamic environments.…”
Section: Relationship Between Reaction Rates and Transcript Concentrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%