1974
DOI: 10.1001/jama.1974.03230470029019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carboxyhemoglobin Levels in American Blood Donors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
28
1
1

Year Published

1976
1976
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
28
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…5 The values of the present study are very close to those cited in the Vogt study but differ sightly in that the correlations between reported levels of smoking among the 94 cigarette users in that study were higher for both expired air CO levels (r = .48) and serum thiocyanate (r = .48). In addition, although the sensitivities and specificities were not reported in the earlier study, calculations from their …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…5 The values of the present study are very close to those cited in the Vogt study but differ sightly in that the correlations between reported levels of smoking among the 94 cigarette users in that study were higher for both expired air CO levels (r = .48) and serum thiocyanate (r = .48). In addition, although the sensitivities and specificities were not reported in the earlier study, calculations from their …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…However, the effects of urbanization were relatively small as compared to that due to cigarette smoking (11). The levels reported by Radford are lower than those previously noted (12). Differences in the methods of measurement of carboxyhemoglobin, better delineation of smokers from nonsmokers and differences in the population sample may be factors which account for these differences or possibly improvement in air quality.…”
Section: (3)mentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Additionally, mild CO poisoning is an unavoidable consequence of cigarette smoking (36). The usefulness of CO as a tool is enhanced by the fact that unlike hypoxia (H), mild CO exposure does not stimulate the carotid body and does not result in an increase in cardiac output or ventilation (33).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%