2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2018.04.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health risks of metal(oid)s in tap water from Ilam city, Iran

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Italy (eg, Toscana, Lombardia, Lazio, Campania), As concentrations in drinking water were chronically between 20 and 50 μg L −1. In important agricultural areas of Mexico, total As levels in the drinking water ranged from 2.7 to 98.7 μg L −1, while in west of Iran, ranged from 3.5 to 62 μg L −1 and in India ranged from 0.1 to 569 μg L −1. According to the World Health Organization ‐ WHO, 0.01 mg L −1 corresponds to the tolerable concentration of As in drinking water, since there are practical difficulties in withdrawing it from drinking water when in concentrations below this.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Italy (eg, Toscana, Lombardia, Lazio, Campania), As concentrations in drinking water were chronically between 20 and 50 μg L −1. In important agricultural areas of Mexico, total As levels in the drinking water ranged from 2.7 to 98.7 μg L −1, while in west of Iran, ranged from 3.5 to 62 μg L −1 and in India ranged from 0.1 to 569 μg L −1. According to the World Health Organization ‐ WHO, 0.01 mg L −1 corresponds to the tolerable concentration of As in drinking water, since there are practical difficulties in withdrawing it from drinking water when in concentrations below this.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where HI is hazard index; i is the exposure pathway of each metal. When HI > 1, it indicates that human health may be adversely effected by heavy metals (Qu et at., 2018;Rehman et al, 2018;Fakhri et at., 2018;Saha et al, 2017).…”
Section: Human Health Risk Assessment From Exposure To Heavy Metalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total cancer risk for adult and children were estimated by sum of cancer risks through ingestion and dermal exposure. The acceptable levels of cancer risk prescribed by USEPA varies from 1x10 -6 to 1x10 -4 (Alves et al, 2014;Fakhri et al, 2018;Qu et al, 2018;Rehman et al, 2018;Saha et al, 2017). When the carcinogenic risk values are higher than 1x10 -4 , it indicates that heavy metals may pose adverse health hazard to local residents.…”
Section: Total Cancer Risk (Tcr)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TTHQ value more than 1 shows the consumer population is at a significant risk of non-carcinogenicity, while TTHQ value less than 1, indicates insignificant risk for non-carcinogenicity [14] , [15] .…”
Section: Experimental Design Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%