2012
DOI: 10.1038/srep00498
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carcinogenicity evaluation for the application of carbon nanotubes as biomaterials in rasH2 mice

Abstract: The application of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) as biomaterials is of wide interest, and studies examining their application in medicine have had considerable significance. Biological safety is the most important factor when considering the clinical application of CNTs as biomaterials, and various toxicity evaluations are required. Among these evaluations, carcinogenicity should be examined with the highest priority; however, no report using transgenic mice to evaluate the carcinogenicity of CNTs has been published… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings implied that the toxicity of the t-ox-MWCNTs was not severe. In agreement with the relatively low toxicity of the t-ox-MWCNTs used here, a previous study reported that MWCNTs implanted into subcutaneous tissue on the backs of genetically-modified rasH2 mice were less carcinogenic than carbon black derived from tattoo ink59.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…These findings implied that the toxicity of the t-ox-MWCNTs was not severe. In agreement with the relatively low toxicity of the t-ox-MWCNTs used here, a previous study reported that MWCNTs implanted into subcutaneous tissue on the backs of genetically-modified rasH2 mice were less carcinogenic than carbon black derived from tattoo ink59.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The other dispersant, PS, was selected because it is typically used as the dispersant for CNTs [28,29]. Our lab has also used PS for in vivo experiments, mainly to avoid provoking an immunoresponse [30,31,32]. Our results showed that PS showed better dispersibility than FBS, using the PR-1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…It is also important to differentiate between the confounding results of toxicity tests designed to determine the effect of accidental exposure to CNTs from tests involving intentional exposure to CNTs which have been modified for biomedical applications [61]. For example, toxicity tests involving very long, pristine CNTs similar to raw material used for industrial purposes demonstrate the potential carcinogenicity of CNTs [62], while CNTs functionalized for biomedical applications, such as those used in our study, are not carcinogenic [63]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%