Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Several different forms of operative procedures for carcinoma of the breast have been advocated, but radical mastectomy remains the one most often recommended. Blood loss during this procedure is frequently high, often necessitating transfusion. Unfortunately, complications of the latter have been significant and justifiably have continued to receive attention in literature. In this study, blood loss and wound healing, with and without the use of electrocautery, in radical mastectomy were evaluated from both clinical and laboratory studies. Fifty patients who underwent radical mastectomy were studied for blood loss, transfusions received, and wound healing. Technique was identical except that one half of the patients had thin skin flap elevation via electrocautery rather than by sharp dissection. The average blood replacement was 160 ml per patient when cautery was used vs. 960 ml per patient when cautery was not used. The postoperative hemoglobin and hematocrit values were statistically similar for both groups. Wound healing was not affected. In addition, a laboratory study, utilizing skin incisions in dogs using scalpel and cautery, was performed. No appreciable difference in healing was noted either on gross or microscopic inspection. The use of electrocautery, therefore, for skin flap elevation during radical mastectomy is recommended.
Several different forms of operative procedures for carcinoma of the breast have been advocated, but radical mastectomy remains the one most often recommended. Blood loss during this procedure is frequently high, often necessitating transfusion. Unfortunately, complications of the latter have been significant and justifiably have continued to receive attention in literature. In this study, blood loss and wound healing, with and without the use of electrocautery, in radical mastectomy were evaluated from both clinical and laboratory studies. Fifty patients who underwent radical mastectomy were studied for blood loss, transfusions received, and wound healing. Technique was identical except that one half of the patients had thin skin flap elevation via electrocautery rather than by sharp dissection. The average blood replacement was 160 ml per patient when cautery was used vs. 960 ml per patient when cautery was not used. The postoperative hemoglobin and hematocrit values were statistically similar for both groups. Wound healing was not affected. In addition, a laboratory study, utilizing skin incisions in dogs using scalpel and cautery, was performed. No appreciable difference in healing was noted either on gross or microscopic inspection. The use of electrocautery, therefore, for skin flap elevation during radical mastectomy is recommended.
Quality of survival as defined by physical and psychosocial criteria was found to be remarkably similar among 134 breast cancer patients and 260 controls. Most of the cases had been diagnosed 5 or more years prior to this study. Physical disability was reported by 19% of the cases and 16% of the controls. The slight excess of disability among the cases was related to surgical treatment. There was no evidence of increased psycho‐social disability among the cases. The principal effect of breast cancer was to triple mortality over a 28‐month period. In both cases and controls, subsequent mortality was associated with reports of disability and ill health on the questionnaire but not with psycho‐social variables, with the possible exception of a pessimistic view of the future.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.