2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2009.03.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cardiac Dyssynchrony Quantitated by Time-to-Peak or Temporal Uniformity of Strain at Longitudinal, Circumferential, and Radial Level: Implications for Resynchronization Therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, despite its overall efficacy, 30-40% of patients receiving CRT do not appear to benefit from this therapy [6] and one concern is that patient selection, which has been primarily based on widening of surface QRS, inadequately identifies chamber dyssynchrony (DYS) [7]. We recently showed that baseline DYS indexed by circumferentially assessed temporal uniformity of strain (TUS) yields greater CRT benefits than other asynchrony measurements [8]. However, it has been suggested that the success of CRT is not only dependent on the capability of the technique to cure dyssynchrony but also on technical factors such as optimized LV lead placement [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, despite its overall efficacy, 30-40% of patients receiving CRT do not appear to benefit from this therapy [6] and one concern is that patient selection, which has been primarily based on widening of surface QRS, inadequately identifies chamber dyssynchrony (DYS) [7]. We recently showed that baseline DYS indexed by circumferentially assessed temporal uniformity of strain (TUS) yields greater CRT benefits than other asynchrony measurements [8]. However, it has been suggested that the success of CRT is not only dependent on the capability of the technique to cure dyssynchrony but also on technical factors such as optimized LV lead placement [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The LVESV reduction together with the classification between large/moderate responder/non-responder is given in Table 3. Improvements in both the magnitude and the synchronicity of myocardial strain among the different LV segments are expected for CRT responders (Delgado et al (2008); Bertola et al (2009)). This is illustrated for one responder (Patient # 1) in Fig.…”
Section: Data Acquisition and Databasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…CRT aims to restore synchrony of motion and strain in the four chambers. When looking specifically at the LV, CRT responders are expected to show at follow-up a higher peak strain value at the end of systole ) and an improved synchronization of the strain curves in the different LV segments (Delgado et al (2008); Bertola et al (2009)). Our algorithm was applied to a database of 13 CRT patients including both responders and non-responders before and after CRT, and at 6-and 12-months follow-ups, representing a total of 51 image sequences.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although methods based on time to peak strain are sensitive to noise and the influence of outliers, an alternative approach is measurement of temporal uniformity of strain, whereby a time plot of regional strains, arranged for LV location is subjected to Fourier analysis. 26 Dyssynchrony index by circumferential temporal uniformity of strain was more reproducible and yielded greater AUC for response than time to peak strain methods. 26 The cross-correlation delay method in which all data points from the velocity curves are incorporated, rather than a manual selection of peak velocities, appears to be a better discriminator of dyssynchrony between control subjects and CRT responders, although its ability to predict CRT response is only marginally better than the conventional TDI-based methods.…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26 Dyssynchrony index by circumferential temporal uniformity of strain was more reproducible and yielded greater AUC for response than time to peak strain methods. 26 The cross-correlation delay method in which all data points from the velocity curves are incorporated, rather than a manual selection of peak velocities, appears to be a better discriminator of dyssynchrony between control subjects and CRT responders, although its ability to predict CRT response is only marginally better than the conventional TDI-based methods. 27 …”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%