2017
DOI: 10.4103/ijri.ijri_503_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cardiac magnetic resonance techniques: Our experience on wide bore 3 tesla magnetic resonance system

Abstract: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has become a widely adapted imaging modality in the diagnosis and management of patients with cardiovascular diseases. It provides unparalleled data of cardiac function and myocardial morphology. Majority of CMR imaging is currently being performed on 1.5 Tesla (T) MR systems. Over the last many years, the cardiac imaging protocols have been standardized and optimized in the 1.5T systems. 3T MR systems are now being used more and more in small and large institutions in o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To explain the discrepancy between the GLS values, several technical points should be considered. The difference in the magnetic field affects the SSFP images, making them more sensitive to susceptibility and banding artefacts [ 44 , 45 ], therefore, impacting the image quality. Likewise, no patient-specific frequency adjustments to mitigate off-resonance effects were performed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To explain the discrepancy between the GLS values, several technical points should be considered. The difference in the magnetic field affects the SSFP images, making them more sensitive to susceptibility and banding artefacts [ 44 , 45 ], therefore, impacting the image quality. Likewise, no patient-specific frequency adjustments to mitigate off-resonance effects were performed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Use of this scanner could have affected image quality and maybe led to missing data because of artifacts in some scans, we consider it unlikely that this has affected the associations between growth and cardiac measures. 34 We standardised our measures on BSA to account for current body size. However, height and weight were measured 1.1 months before MRI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One participant was scanned on a 1.5 T scanner, the same magnet strength that is used in one commercial MRI-Linac system, and the image quality for this participant was comparable to the participants scanned on the 3 T scanner. In some cases, particularly cardiac imaging, lower magnet strengths may be preferable [ 31 , 32 ], however, conclusions cannot be made regarding this from this study due to the very small sample size. The authors feel that the results of this study are broadly applicable to MRIg AF CR, particularly considering imaging capabilities on commercial MRI-Linacs are variable and rapidly developing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%