2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2015.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy May Be Antiarrhythmic Particularly in Responders

Abstract: CRT may significantly reduce risk of VA compared with ICDs in patients who meet criteria for CRT. CRT responders have significant reduction in VA compared with nonresponders. CRT nonresponse might significantly increase risk of VA.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent meta-analysis indicated that this intervention may significantly reduce the risk of ventricular arrhythmias when compared with patients receiving ICDs. Interestingly the same study also showed that patients who were not-responsive to CRT may have had a significantly higher risk of ventricular arrhythmias ( Saini et al, 2016 ). Furthermore, it was also shown that CRT was able to efficiently reduce subcellular heterogeneity of structure and function of RyRs and T-tubules in a canine model of HF, potentially due to the restoration of ventricular synchrony ( Li et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Therapeutic Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…A recent meta-analysis indicated that this intervention may significantly reduce the risk of ventricular arrhythmias when compared with patients receiving ICDs. Interestingly the same study also showed that patients who were not-responsive to CRT may have had a significantly higher risk of ventricular arrhythmias ( Saini et al, 2016 ). Furthermore, it was also shown that CRT was able to efficiently reduce subcellular heterogeneity of structure and function of RyRs and T-tubules in a canine model of HF, potentially due to the restoration of ventricular synchrony ( Li et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Therapeutic Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Up to now there is insufficient clinical data from randomized clinical trials to prove superiority of a combined CRT and ICD implantation (CRT-D) over CRT pacemakers (CRT-P) [1, 4]. Besides improvement of LVEF there is evidence for anti-arrhythmic effects following CRT implantation [5]. A recent meta-analysis of more than 12,000 patients demonstrated a reduction in the risk of all-cause mortality for CRT-D, which was more pronounced in patients suffering from ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) compared to non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, QRS duration was not compared between the CeP and CoP groups in a parallel fashion, as the QRS duration was intrinsic in the CeP group while only paced QRS duration was collected in the CoP group, and instead we could only evaluate changes of QRS duration in separate groups. Fourth, previous studies demonstrated reverse remodeling after CRT was associated with reduced risk of ventricular arrhythmia episodes as well as mitral regurgitation; thus it would be worth evaluating the effect of pacing cessation on these parameters, whereas we did not collect and analyze the data. Lastly, we used a comprehensive definition of super‐response after CRT, and thus our results should be interpreted with caution and not be extrapolated to other possible super‐responder populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%