2013
DOI: 10.1093/europace/eut140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cardiac three-dimensional rotational angiography can be performed with low radiation dose while preserving image quality

Abstract: Three-dimensional rotational angiography is possible with a significant reduction in ED (to the level of prospectively gated cardiac computed X-ray tomography) without compromising image quality. Low-dose 3DRA could become the preferred online 3D imaging modality for pulmonary vein isolation and other anatomy-dependent ablations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of 3D‐DRA in CHD was first described by Glatz (11). The advantages of 3D‐DRA are (i) convenience of performing tomographic imaging in the cardiac catheterization lab instead of a radiology suite; (ii) tomographic imaging from 3D‐DRA provides details that are not obtainable using biplane cine‐angiography; (iii) selection of optimal camera angles prior to a planned intervention; (iv) accurate registration of the 3D‐image to live fluoroscopy as the image is acquired under the same conditions compared with a computed tomography (CT) or MRI . However, the utility of 3D‐DSRA has not been studied during cardiac catheterizations for CHD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The use of 3D‐DRA in CHD was first described by Glatz (11). The advantages of 3D‐DRA are (i) convenience of performing tomographic imaging in the cardiac catheterization lab instead of a radiology suite; (ii) tomographic imaging from 3D‐DRA provides details that are not obtainable using biplane cine‐angiography; (iii) selection of optimal camera angles prior to a planned intervention; (iv) accurate registration of the 3D‐image to live fluoroscopy as the image is acquired under the same conditions compared with a computed tomography (CT) or MRI . However, the utility of 3D‐DSRA has not been studied during cardiac catheterizations for CHD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initially, because of concerns of excess radiation to obtain 3D‐DRA, its use was limited to complex interventional procedures. Technological changes have made the radiation dose to obtain 3D‐DRA similar to bi‐plane cine‐angiography allowing its routine use in congenital cardiac interventions. However, these lower dose protocols require larger contrast volumes to be injected to obtain diagnostic quality 3D‐DRA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, despite deep sedation, patient motion or respiratory artefacts were still possible. Furthermore, although the radiation dose is an important concern, significant reduction of the effective radiation dose during rotational angiography is also possible with novel protocols [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effective radiation dose for 4DRA, calculated by patient-specific Monte-Carlo simulation, was 5.1 ± 1.1 mSv in Wielandts study [21]. De Buck et al state that three-dimensional rotational angiography is possible with a significant reduction in the effective dose without compromising image quality [11]. To reduce the effective dose they dropped the frame rate from 248 to 67 and 45 frames.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%