2013
DOI: 10.1139/apnm-2012-0131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cardiovascular drift in trained paraplegic and able-bodied individuals during prolonged wheelchair exercise: effect of fluid replacement

Abstract: The progressive heart rate (HR) increase and stroke volume (SV) decline during prolonged constant-load leg exercise signifies cardiovascular drift (CVdrift); fluid replacement is known to minimize this phenomenon. Like their able-bodied counterparts (AB), paraplegic athletes undergo prolonged exercise during training and competition, which could result in CVdrift. The aim of this study is to address the role of rehydration on preventing CVdrift in spinal cord injured (SCI) paraplegic athletes. Eight SCI athlet… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A cardiac-output increase induced by a physical load is conditioned by an increase in the heart rate and in the stroke volume [18]. Therefore, stroke volume is an essential structural component of cardiac output.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A cardiac-output increase induced by a physical load is conditioned by an increase in the heart rate and in the stroke volume [18]. Therefore, stroke volume is an essential structural component of cardiac output.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zacharakis et al 37 , observaram uma redução significativa da MC e aumento da FC em grupos de indivíduos, com e sem lesão na coluna vertebral, que foram submetidos a exercício em condições termoneutras, em cadeira de rodas, sem reposição de líquidos. O cardiovascular drift é um produto da função cardiovascular gerado por desidratação 2 .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…After these screening processes, thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria but one study was later excluded due to insufficient duration and environment to test the thermoregulatory capabilities. As a result, a total of twelve studies were included in this meta-analysis (Boot, Binkhorst, & Hopman, 2006;Castellani et al, 2001;Dawson, Bridle, & Lockwood, 1994;Fitzgerald, Sedlock, & Knowlton, 1990;Goosey-Tolfrey, Swainson, Boyd, Atkinson, & Tolfrey, 2008;Griggs, Havenith, Price, Mason, & Goosey-Tolfrey, 2017;Price & Campbell, 1997, 1999Theisen, Vanlandewijck, Sturbois, & Francaux, 2001;Trbovich, Ortega, Schroeder, & Fredrickson, 2014;Veltmeijer, Pluim, Thijssen, Hopman, & Eijsvogels, 2014;Zacharakis, Kounalakis, Nassis, & Geladas, 2013). A flow diagram of the screening process is presented in Figure 1.…”
Section: Literature Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effect size in this meta-analysis was calculated as the raw mean difference of core body temperature during exercise between persons with and without SCI. Among the included studies, two studies reported final measurement (cessation of exercise) core body temperature (Boot et al, 2006;Castellani et al, 2001); four studies reported change-from-baseline core body temperature (Dawson et al, 1994;Fitzgerald et al, 1990;Theisen et al, 2001;Zacharakis et al, 2013); three studies reported both final measurement and change-from-baseline core body temperature (Goosey-Tolfrey et al, 2008;Griggs et al, 2017;Trbovich et al, 2014); and three studies reported change-from-baseline core body temperature directly and presented figures of core body temperature responses, allowing indirect data extraction of final measurement core body temperature and correlation coefficients of change-from-baseline core body temperature to be calculated (see below) (Price & Campbell, 1997, 1999Veltmeijer et al, 2014). Considering baseline core body temperatures showed difference between experimental groups, the calculation of raw mean difference in this meta-analysis was based on change-from-baseline, when both final measurement and change-from-baseline data are available.…”
Section: Meta-analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation