Aging is associated with decreased aerobic fitness and cardiac remodeling
leading to increased risk for cardiovascular disease. High-intensity interval
training (HIIT) on the treadmill has been reported to be more effective in
ameliorating these risk factors compared with moderate-intensity continuous
training (MICT) in patients with cardiometabolic disease. In older adults,
however, weight-bearing activities are frequently limited due to musculoskeletal
and balance problems. The purpose of this study was to examine the feasibility
and safety of non-weight-bearing all-extremity HIIT in older adults. In
addition, we tested the hypothesis that all-extremity HIIT will be more
effective in improving aerobic fitness, cardiac function, and metabolic risk
factors compared with all-extremity MICT. Fifty-one healthy sedentary older
adults (age: 65±1 years) were randomized to HIIT (n=17), MICT
(n=18) or non-exercise control (CONT; n=16). HIIT (4×4
minutes 90% of peak heart rate; HRpeak) and isocaloric MICT (70%
of HRpeak) were performed on a non-weight-bearing all-extremity ergometer,
4x/week for 8 weeks under supervision. All-extremity HIIT was feasible in older
adults and resulted in no adverse events. Aerobic fitness (peak oxygen
consumption; VO2peak) and ejection fraction (echocardiography)
improved by 11% (P<0.0001) and 4% (P=0.001)
respectively in HIIT, while no changes were observed in MICT and CONT
(P≥0.1). Greater improvements in ejection fraction were associated with
greater improvements in VO2peak (r=0.57; P<0.0001).
Insulin resistance (homeostatic model assessment) decreased only in HIIT by
26% (P=0.016). Diastolic function, body composition, glucose and
lipids were unaffected (P≥0.1). In conclusion, all-extremity HIIT is
feasible and safe in older adults. HIIT, but not MICT, improved aerobic fitness,
ejection fraction, and insulin resistance.