1998
DOI: 10.1159/000052284
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cardiovascular Effects of Alpha-Blockers Used for the Treatment of Symptomatic BPH: Impact on Safety and Well-Being

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These observations suggest that ␣ 1B -adrenoceptors are more important for blood pressure regulation, and that compounds having reduced activity at ␣ 1B -sites compared with other ␣ 1 -adrenoceptors would be expected to cause fewer cardiovascular side effects than classical ␣ 1 -antagonists (Take et al, 1998), supporting the concept that an ␣ 1A -selective compound would be useful in BPH (Hancock et al, 1998a). Tamsulosin causes fewer hypotensive side effects in clinical practice (de Mey, 1998) and in animal studies (Hancock et al, 1998a,b), despite only moderate differences (Յ20 fold) in affinity at ␣ 1A -compared with either ␣ 1B -or ␣ 1D -adrenoceptors (Hancock, 1996). However, several highly selective ␣ 1A -antagonists intended to be uroselective, including REC 15/2739 (Leonardi et al, 1997) and Ro-70-0004 (Williams et al, 1999), failed to improve both voiding and irritative symptoms in the clinic, such that the hypothesis of ␣ 1A -selectivity correlating to uroselectivity remains unproven.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These observations suggest that ␣ 1B -adrenoceptors are more important for blood pressure regulation, and that compounds having reduced activity at ␣ 1B -sites compared with other ␣ 1 -adrenoceptors would be expected to cause fewer cardiovascular side effects than classical ␣ 1 -antagonists (Take et al, 1998), supporting the concept that an ␣ 1A -selective compound would be useful in BPH (Hancock et al, 1998a). Tamsulosin causes fewer hypotensive side effects in clinical practice (de Mey, 1998) and in animal studies (Hancock et al, 1998a,b), despite only moderate differences (Յ20 fold) in affinity at ␣ 1A -compared with either ␣ 1B -or ␣ 1D -adrenoceptors (Hancock, 1996). However, several highly selective ␣ 1A -antagonists intended to be uroselective, including REC 15/2739 (Leonardi et al, 1997) and Ro-70-0004 (Williams et al, 1999), failed to improve both voiding and irritative symptoms in the clinic, such that the hypothesis of ␣ 1A -selectivity correlating to uroselectivity remains unproven.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although headache and dizziness were reported, these AEs were not associated with orthostatic hypotension in our studies. Although it has been reported that tamsulosin HCl, a selective antagonist of α 1A -adrenoceptors, which are not present in the blood vessels, shows less frequent orthostatic hypotension than conventional α1-antagonists, [17][18][19] our results show that administering tamsulosin HCl after meal is preferred to taking in fasted state in order to prevent orthostatic hypotension. Our results also showed hypotensive potential of concomitant administration of tadalafil and tamsulosin HCl, but SBP was relatively less influenced than DBP, and dizziness, a symptom related to the decrease of DBP, was reported in 2 subjects (5.8%) only in fed study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…5,7,8 Although several studies have shown that α-blocker therapy could improve cerebral blood flow after treatment for 4-8 weeks, 20,21 acute hypotension associated with anti hypertensive therapy could precipitate cerebral hypoperfusion and ischemic stroke. [2][3][4]11 One possible explanation of our findings was that patients without underlying hypertension were vulnerable to the first-dose effect of α-blockers and contributed to the observed increase in risk of ischemic stroke in the early initiation period of α-blockers in the whole study population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 Nevertheless, they have inherent adverse cardiovascular effects, including dizziness and hypotension, especially soon after initiation (known as the first-dose effect), because of their effects on lowering blood pressure. 5,7,8 Researchers have reported an increase in the risk of hypotension-related adverse events, including hypotension, syncope and fractures, during the initiation period of α-blocker therapy. 9 Our research group found that the use of α-blockers was associated with an increased risk of hip and femur fractures during the early initiation period among older men without hypertension.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%