1970
DOI: 10.3758/bf03328845
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cardiovascular responses to auditory stimuli

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

1971
1971
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even more speculatively, it is possible that there is a slight deceleration within the first 1–2 heart beats after trial onset (time T + 1) followed by a small acceleration (T + 2, T + 3) prior to the large deceleration discussed here. Such a triphasic response (deceleration, acceleration, deceleration) would be consistent with results observed from studies with shorter and less meaningful auditory stimuli ( Keefe and Johnson, 1970 ; Graham and Slaby, 1973 ; cited in Andreassi, 2007 p. 354). In short, it seems likely that all three types of degraded speech required greater commitment of cognitive resources in the service of initial encoding of the signal (as indicated by a stronger OR for these stimuli), but that synthetic speech may have incurred the greatest demand.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Even more speculatively, it is possible that there is a slight deceleration within the first 1–2 heart beats after trial onset (time T + 1) followed by a small acceleration (T + 2, T + 3) prior to the large deceleration discussed here. Such a triphasic response (deceleration, acceleration, deceleration) would be consistent with results observed from studies with shorter and less meaningful auditory stimuli ( Keefe and Johnson, 1970 ; Graham and Slaby, 1973 ; cited in Andreassi, 2007 p. 354). In short, it seems likely that all three types of degraded speech required greater commitment of cognitive resources in the service of initial encoding of the signal (as indicated by a stronger OR for these stimuli), but that synthetic speech may have incurred the greatest demand.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The major finding of this study is the failure of the cephalic vasomotor responses to differentiate among experimental conditions. This has previously been noted by others (e.g., Davis, Buchwald, & Frankman, 1955;Keefe & Johnson, 1970;Raskin, Kotses, & Bever, 1969a, 1969b. The obtained biphasic cephalic pulse amplitude response (constriction-dilation) and the dilative response of cephalic blood content are both apparently indicative of the OR.…”
supporting
confidence: 79%
“…Sokolov considered this dissociation of the vascular response so important that he tended to use it as an operational definition of the OCCllrrence of an orientation reaction. This usage h~s not generally been adopted in the West, where several experimenters have confirmed that peripheral vasoconstriction follows novel stimuli (e.g., Unger, 1964;Zimny & Miller, 1966), while others have failed (Cohen & Johnson, 1971;Keefe & Johnson, 1970;Raskin, Kotses & Bever, 1969a, b). Western investigators tend to use the GSR (e.g., Germana, 1968;Maltzman & Raskin, 1965) or a transient desynchronization of the EEG (Berlyne & Borsa, 1968) as measures of the OR.…”
Section: The Orientation Reactionmentioning
confidence: 99%