1971
DOI: 10.1037/h0030882
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of intensity and the signal value of stimuli on the orienting and defensive responses.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

3
4
0

Year Published

1973
1973
1988
1988

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
3
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Vinogradova & Sokolov, 1957 ;Sokolov, 1963 ;Vinogradova, 1965). The observation of a monophasic decrease in BV with intense audhory stimulation is in line with the earlier Soviet results but at odds with the more recent findings of Raskin et al (1969b) and Cohen & Johnson (1971). Such monophasic increases in forehead BV to moderate stimuli have also been found in several Western studies (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Vinogradova & Sokolov, 1957 ;Sokolov, 1963 ;Vinogradova, 1965). The observation of a monophasic decrease in BV with intense audhory stimulation is in line with the earlier Soviet results but at odds with the more recent findings of Raskin et al (1969b) and Cohen & Johnson (1971). Such monophasic increases in forehead BV to moderate stimuli have also been found in several Western studies (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Such monophasic increases in forehead BV to moderate stimuli have also been found in several Western studies (e.g. Hertzman & Dillon, 1939;Royer, 1965; Raskin et al, 1 9 6 9~; Cohen & Johnson, 1971;Cook, 1972). However, controversy has arisen over the direction of the forehead BV response to intense stimulation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Uno and Grings (1965) generally confirmed these results, and reported a correlation of 0.72 between the two measures., confirming their close relationship. Cohen and Johnson (1971), while reporting PPV response habituation (contrary to the above findings), noted that PBV results were so similar as to obviate the necessity of reporting PBV data. Levander, Lidberg, and Schalling (1974) also found that both PPV and PBV vasoconstrictive responses habituated, and recorded intraindividual correlations of the two measures ranging up to 0.98.…”
mentioning
confidence: 45%