2018
DOI: 10.20471/acc.2018.57.01.03
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cardiovascular Risk Assessed by Reynolds Risk Score in Relation to Waist Circumference in Apparently Healthy Middle-Aged Population in Montenegro

Abstract: SUMMARY – Reynolds Risk Score (RRS) is regarded as a good screening tool for cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Since CVD is the leading cause of death in Montenegro, we aimed to assess the risk of CVD as assessed by RRS and to examine its association with cardiometabolic parameters in apparently healthy middle-aged population. In addition, we aimed to test whether obesity had an independent influence on RRS. A total of 132 participants (mean age 56.2±6.73 years, 69% females) were included. Body mass index (BM… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 The severity of atherosclerosisvaries considerably from asymptomatic to life-threatening organ dysfunction. [2][3][4][5] One of the fundamental elements for establishing prevention, treatment and prognosis of atherosclerotic disease is the assessment of clinical forms of the disease. [6][7][8][9][10] Diabetes mellitus, lipid disorders and/or ischemic heart disease are the clinical exponents of atherosclerosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 The severity of atherosclerosisvaries considerably from asymptomatic to life-threatening organ dysfunction. [2][3][4][5] One of the fundamental elements for establishing prevention, treatment and prognosis of atherosclerotic disease is the assessment of clinical forms of the disease. [6][7][8][9][10] Diabetes mellitus, lipid disorders and/or ischemic heart disease are the clinical exponents of atherosclerosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparing groups A and B for anthropometric, functional, and biochemical parameters, it was clear that those patients with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m 2 had significantly higher cardiovascular risk levels than the control group. This higher cardiovascular risk can be seen in the first instance in the higher values of BMI, WC [32], SBP, and DBP [33]. The higher serum concentrations of TCH [34], TG [32], Creat [32], ALT [35], and UA [36], as well as the lower serum levels of HDL [32] and eGFR [32] in this group, also point to an unfavorable cardiometabolic profile.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…This higher cardiovascular risk can be seen in the first instance in the higher values of BMI, WC [32], SBP, and DBP [33]. The higher serum concentrations of TCH [34], TG [32], Creat [32], ALT [35], and UA [36], as well as the lower serum levels of HDL [32] and eGFR [32] in this group, also point to an unfavorable cardiometabolic profile. Finally, group A presented significant endothelial dysfunction, shown mainly by the elevated level of SI and the lower level of PPT [37,38], but also by higher serum concentration of UA and TCH [39].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…This is the primary focus of our study. The mentioned scores, such as the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) risk engine [ 30 ], SCORE2-Diabetes Working Group [ 31 ], European Society of Cardiology (ESC) [ 32 ], Australian Type 2 Diabetes Risk Assessment Tool (AUSDRISK) [ 33 ], German Diabetes Risk Score [ 34 ], Framingham score [ 35 ], ASCVD Risk Score Plus [ 36 ], QRISK [ 37 ], Reynolds [ 38 ], and Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) Risk Core [ 39 ], do not utilize CT-based CAC scores. Moreover, most of these scores primarily predict cardiovascular risk, which differs from our primary goal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%