“CARE” in social media: perceptions of reputation in the healthcare sector

Abstract

PurposeGuided by the growing importance of social-mediated organisational communication, this study examines how communication professionals within healthcare organisations perceive and respond to the reputation impacts of social media on the organisation’s reputation. Although the healthcare sector finds itself in the midst of a (continually) transforming landscape characterised by large amounts of digital health (mis)information and an empowered “patient-as-consumer”, little is known about how professionals in this sector understand the changes and respond to them. Moreover, much extant scholarship on the topic is published in specialised health or medical journals and does not explicitly address the communication implications for healthcare organisations.Design/methodology/approachIn-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with communication professionals responsible for social media across eight hospitals in the Netherlands. The sample included two participants working as communication consultants/social media advisors for healthcare organisations. In all, 15 interviews were conducted.FindingsBuilding on interviewee perspectives, the authors advance the CARE (Control, Access(ability), Responsive(ness) and Engagement) model of social-mediated communication, highlighting the dualistic characteristics of each dimension. This model is built upon a careful analysis of healthcare professional responses. In an always-on environment, understanding and managing the tensions within the authors’ model may be decisive to the reputation implications of social media use.Originality/valueUnderstanding the tensions within each dimension lends a more nuanced perspective on the potential impact(s) of social media as experienced by professionals in the field. In shifting away from a binary, either/or approach, the paper contributes to explicating the complexities of a pervasive phenomenon (i.e. social-mediated communication) and its multifaceted impacts on the healthcare sector.

Employee influencer management: evidence from state-owned enterprises in Indonesia

“…Moreover, they also often combine the content, for instance, linking their hobby to corporate content. This means that employee influencers need a content approach that combines corporate with more personalized and humanized content in order to build a relationship (Hsiung, 2012; Chaudhri et al , 2021). The results show that through a variety of posts, influencers secure an opportunity to form a multi-stranded relationship; they help to make the brand more personal to their followers and maintain their interest by offering additional content that will appeal to their other interests.…”

Responding to online complaints in webcare by public organizations: the impact on continuance intention and reputation

“…This creates specific challenges for organizations that aim to use social media in their reputation management. More specifically, the challenges identified concern message and content control, the accessibility of the organization and its members, responsiveness to complainers and engagement with audiences (Chaudri et al , 2021). In particular, accessibility and responsiveness are relevant in the context of webcare and reputation management.…”

“…the ability for messages to amplify quickly across multiple audiences (Albu and Etter, 2016). The demand for responsiveness might also create an “always-on environment” and can cause more profound reflections on organizational priorities, like how responding to online complaints relates to other organizational activities that might impact the reputation (Chaudri et al , 2021).…”

Glocal trends and employer ratings as a critical branding approach in the social economy

“…The health and social sector is subject to permanent change. In this industry too, digital information shapes the "patient-as-consumer" approach (Chaudhri et al, 2021). The competence of the staff forms the basis for the service quality.…”