2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00085.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carelessness and Discriminability in Work Role Requirement Judgments: Influences of Role Ambiguity and Cognitive Complexity

Abstract: Fundamental to effective human resource systems is the capture of data regarding work role requirements. However, previous research on factors that influence work role requirement judgments has been largely equivocal. From a sample of 203 incumbents, representing 73 unique occupations, we investigated 2 cognitive sources of influence on carelessness and discriminability in work role requirement judgments. We hypothesized that incumbents perceiving high role ambiguity would provide ratings that were more carele… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
44
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
(119 reference statements)
2
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[and] to personal characteristics or style" (D. Katz & Kahn, 1978, p. 190). Therefore, work role requirements encompass more than just the activities incumbents must perform as part of their roles, but also extend to relevant attributes that are requisite to role enactment, such as different knowledge, skills, abilities, and traits of the role holders themselves (Dierdorff & Rubin, 2007). Of importance, similarities in work role requirements also enable individual work roles to be meaningfully combined in occupational groupings that share a common overall goal or purpose (Dierdorff & Morgeson, 2007).…”
Section: Managerial Work Role Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[and] to personal characteristics or style" (D. Katz & Kahn, 1978, p. 190). Therefore, work role requirements encompass more than just the activities incumbents must perform as part of their roles, but also extend to relevant attributes that are requisite to role enactment, such as different knowledge, skills, abilities, and traits of the role holders themselves (Dierdorff & Rubin, 2007). Of importance, similarities in work role requirements also enable individual work roles to be meaningfully combined in occupational groupings that share a common overall goal or purpose (Dierdorff & Morgeson, 2007).…”
Section: Managerial Work Role Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, organizations were perceived to be more effective when workers were less confused about the tasks that were involved in carrying out their assignments. To reduce the level of role ambiguity in the organization, managers and human resource personnel should clearly articulate to each employee their expected role activity, performance contingency, and work approach (Dierdorff & Rubin, 2007). This includes providing information about what should be done, how it should be done, and when it should be done (Boardman & Sundquist, 2009).…”
Section: Does Management Matter?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Work roles are specialised in terms of the expectations of behaviour or tasks to be undertaken and of the knowledge and skills required by the role holder. [26] Roles are determined through a process in which an employee accepts an organisationally predetermined set of role behaviours. A consensus then develops around the way in which these behaviours are conducted in practice and the role becomes embedded to the extent that any contrary behaviours cause role conflict.…”
Section: The Role Of the Pe And Local Context For The Studymentioning
confidence: 99%