“…On the other hand, an alternative discourse has gained ground in recent years and portrays Myanmar's democratic opening as a military strategy to institutionalize a hybrid form of rule, in order to maintain political stability and military power with increased domestic and international legitimacy (Bünte, ; Huang, ; L. Jones, ). A core element in this strategy is the military‐designed 2008 Constitution, which provides a framework for a unitary state with formal democracy and guaranteed positions of power for the military in parliamentary politics, government, and public administration (Egreteau, ). Proponents of this interpretation also point to the importance of geopolitics in Southeast Asia, arguing that the military regime and Western states had a mutual interest in re‐engaging each other in the context of a “rising China” and that this gave increased legitimacy for the military even without substantive political reforms (Bünte & Dosch, ; Egreteau & Jagan, ).…”