2020
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6420/ab89c3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carleman estimates for a stochastic degenerate parabolic equation and applications to null controllability and an inverse random source problem

Abstract: In this paper, we establish two Carleman estimates for a stochastic degenerate parabolic equation. The first one is for the backward stochastic degenerate parabolic equation with singular weight function. Combining this Carleman estimate and an approximate argument, we prove the null controllability of the forward stochastic degenerate parabolic equation with the gradient term. The second one is for the forward stochastic degenerate parabolic equation with regular weighted function, based on which we obtain th… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, many efforts have been devoted to studying the Carleman estimate for stochastic partial differential equations, for example [3,24,34,40] for stochastic heat equation, [42] for stochastic wave equation, [15] for stochastic Korteweg-de Vries equation, [17] for stochastic Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation, [27] for stochastic Schrödinger equation, [18] for the stochastic Kawahara equation, and so on. To the best of our knowledge, there are only two papers about Carleman estimates for one dimensional stochastic degenerate operator du − (x α u x ) x dt [25,38], which is very different from the degenerate Grushin operator du − u xx dt − x 2γ u yy dt. In these works, Carleman estimates were mainly applied to deal with stochastic control problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, many efforts have been devoted to studying the Carleman estimate for stochastic partial differential equations, for example [3,24,34,40] for stochastic heat equation, [42] for stochastic wave equation, [15] for stochastic Korteweg-de Vries equation, [17] for stochastic Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation, [27] for stochastic Schrödinger equation, [18] for the stochastic Kawahara equation, and so on. To the best of our knowledge, there are only two papers about Carleman estimates for one dimensional stochastic degenerate operator du − (x α u x ) x dt [25,38], which is very different from the degenerate Grushin operator du − u xx dt − x 2γ u yy dt. In these works, Carleman estimates were mainly applied to deal with stochastic control problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Carleman estimates are also introduced to solve inverse problems for stochastic partial differential equations. Particularly, we refer the readers to [13,15,18,20,21] for some recent works on inverse problems of stochastic parabolic equations via Carleman estimates. In all the above mentioned papers, Carleman estimates are established by using two-layer weight functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• In this notes, we only give a very brief introduction to controllability problems for three kinds of SPDEs. Recently, there are also some works for controllability problems for other types of SPDEs, such as [16] for stochastic complex parabolic equations, [21] for stochastic Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equations, [33,72] for degenerate stochastic parabolic equations, [32] for coupled stochastic parabolic equations, [38] for stochastic Schrödinger equations and [55] for a refined stochastic wave equation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• By means of the tools that we developed for solving the stochastic controllability problems, in [35,36,50] we initiated the study of inverse problems for SPDEs (See also [72,77,78] for further interesting progress), in which the point is that, unlike most of the previous works in this topic, the problem is genuinely stochastic and therefore it cannot be reduced to any deterministic one. Especially, it was found in [50] that both the formulation of stochastic inverse problems and the tools to solve them differ considerably from their deterministic counterpart.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation