2018
DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2017.10.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carotid Artery Disease as a Predictor of In-Hospital Postoperative Stroke After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting From 1999 to 2011

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there has been much debate on routine use of carotid doppler to diagnose significant carotid stenosis preoperatively, and this is not currently routinely used at our centre, although is used in selected cases. The prevalence of significant carotid stenosis in unselected patients is found to be low, and the incidence of stroke in patients with severe carotid stenosis is found to be too low to warrant widespread screening and is not recommended by current guidelines [9][10][11][12] . Some suggest selective screening (for example, patients >70 years with previous TIA/stroke) may be useful as there is some evidence that severe carotid stenosis is a significant predictor for perioperative stroke following cardiac surgery in these patients 13 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there has been much debate on routine use of carotid doppler to diagnose significant carotid stenosis preoperatively, and this is not currently routinely used at our centre, although is used in selected cases. The prevalence of significant carotid stenosis in unselected patients is found to be low, and the incidence of stroke in patients with severe carotid stenosis is found to be too low to warrant widespread screening and is not recommended by current guidelines [9][10][11][12] . Some suggest selective screening (for example, patients >70 years with previous TIA/stroke) may be useful as there is some evidence that severe carotid stenosis is a significant predictor for perioperative stroke following cardiac surgery in these patients 13 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there has been much debate on routine use of carotid doppler to diagnose significant carotid stenosis preoperatively, and this is not currently routinely used at our center, although is used in selected cases. The prevalence of significant carotid stenosis in unselected patients is found to be low, and the incidence of stroke in patients with severe carotid stenosis is found to be too low to warrant widespread screening and is not recommended by current guidelines 9‐12 . Some suggest selective screening (for example, patients >70 years with previous TIA/stroke) may be useful as there is some evidence that severe carotid stenosis is a significant predictor for perioperative stroke following cardiac surgery in these patients 13 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prevalence of significant carotid stenosis in unselected patients is found to be low, and the incidence of stroke in patients with severe carotid stenosis is found to be too low to warrant widespread screening and is not recommended by current guidelines. [9][10][11][12] Some suggest selective screening (for example, patients >70 years with previous TIA/stroke) may be useful as there is some evidence that severe carotid stenosis is a significant predictor for perioperative stroke following cardiac surgery in these patients. 13 It is notable that even in studies describing preoperative carotid screening there is a low rate of carotid intervention even when severe stenosis are detected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Both severe asymptomatic unilateral and bilateral carotid stenosis are independent risk factors for in-hospital postoperative strokes following coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). 2 Large studies of similar patient populations found no difference in stroke and death between staged and synchronous carotid intervention and CABG. 3,4 One meta analysis of 44,895 patients, however, found a statistically significant lower risk of myocardial infarction but a higher risk of stroke and death for synchronous procedures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%