Carpenter-Coustan Criteria Compared With the National Diabetes Data Group Thresholds for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

Cheng, Yvonne W.; Block-Kurbisch, Ingrid; Caughey, Aaron B.

doi:10.1097/aog.0b013e3181ae8d85

Cited by 73 publications

(67 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…16,17 In the present study, however, the incidence of LGA was no statistically difference among the three groups. As a result, the incidence of maternal complications between group 1 and 2 was not different.…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 73%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Pregnancy outcome in women with gestational diabetes mellitus according to the Carpenter–Coustan criteria in Thailand

Luengmettakul

Sunsaneevithayakul

Talungchit

2015

J of Obstet and Gynaecol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 73%

“…[15][16][17] The incidence of birth asphyxia in this study was similar between the two groups. In this study, birth asphyxia was diagnosed on Apgar score at 1 min ≤7 according to WHO and the hospital guidelines.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 49%

Pregnancy outcome in women with gestational diabetes mellitus according to the Carpenter–Coustan criteria in Thailand

Luengmettakul

Sunsaneevithayakul

Talungchit

2015

J of Obstet and Gynaecol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Whether women with OGTT values above the CC threshold, but below the NDDG threshold, are at increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes has been inconsistently reported [8,9,11,12,14,15]. The results of this study revealed that, while mean birth weight was comparable between CC only and NDDG groups, it was significantly greater than in those without GDM (P <0.001).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 50%

“…Like this study, other studies have also found an increase in both maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes in GDM women diagnosed by CC criteria only. The risks included higher rates of cesarean and operative vaginal delivery [8,9,11,12], macrosomia [8,9,11,12,14,15], neonatal hyperbilirubinemia and hypoglycemia [12,15].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus: comparison between National Diabetes Data Group and Carpenter– Coustan criteria

2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: A 100-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) is commonly used to diagnose gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Carpenter-Coustan (CC) criteria, based on lower threshold plasma glucose values than the National Diabetes Data Group (NDDG) criteria, result in an apparently increased prevalence of GDM. However, the extent of the increase is not known, and effects on perinatal outcome are not clear. Objective: To evaluate the increase in the prevalence of GDM if CC criteria are applied to OGTT results, we compared findings with NDDG criteria. Pregnancy outcomes between women without GDM and those with GDM diagnosed by NDDG and CC criteria were compared. Methods: A total of 640 at-risk pregnant women were studied. They were either diagnosed as having GDM by initial testing (145 women), or repeat testing at 24−28 weeks of gestation (495 women). CC criteria were applied to the OGTT results and prevalence of GDM was re-evaluated. Results: The apparent prevalence of GDM increased by 22.2% using CC criteria. The change was 27.6% at the initial test and 31.5% at repeat tests during 24−28 weeks of gestation. Infant birth weight in GDM diagnosed by either NDDG or CC criteria was significantly higher than in the negative OGTT group (P < 0.001). Rates of macrosomia were comparable. Neonatal hypoglycemia was 14.6% in the NDDG group, 8.2% in CC only group, and 4.6% in negative OGTT group (P < 0.001). Conclusion:The CC criteria identify 22% more cases of GDM than NDDG criteria during initial and repeat tests.

show abstract

Correlation between serum markers in the second trimester and preterm birth before 34 weeks in asymptomatic twin pregnancies

Kim

Hwa

et al. 2021

Intl J Gynecology & Obste

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

According to the World Health Organization, more than 15 million preterm neonates are born every year, and this number continues to increase. 1 Prematurity is the principal cause of mortality and morbidity in children. 2 The rates of morbidity and mortality increase in births before 34 weeks of gestation, because the lungs have not yet matured, which significantly affects the prognosis of neonates.Multifetal pregnancy, infection, diabetes, and hypertension are common causes of preterm birth. 1 According to American and European studies, although multiple pregnancies account for only 1%-3% of all pregnancies, they comprise 17%-20% of all preterm births. [2][3][4] The increasing use of artificial reproductive techniques and the increasing number of twin pregnancies have led to an increase in the risk of preterm birth. Because of this, recent studies have focused on identifying strategies to prevent preterm birth in twin pregnancies.

show abstract

Carpenter-Coustan Criteria Compared With the National Diabetes Data Group Thresholds for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

Abstract: II.

Cited by 73 publications

References 18 publications

Pregnancy outcome in women with gestational diabetes mellitus according to the Carpenter–Coustan criteria in Thailand

Pregnancy outcome in women with gestational diabetes mellitus according to the Carpenter–Coustan criteria in Thailand

Diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus: comparison between National Diabetes Data Group and Carpenter– Coustan criteria

Correlation between serum markers in the second trimester and preterm birth before 34 weeks in asymptomatic twin pregnancies

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About