2013
DOI: 10.1088/0026-1394/50/3/200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carrier-phase TWSTFT experiments using the ETS-VIII satellite

Abstract: The National Institute of Information and Communications Technology (NICT) has developed and tested carrier-phase two-way satellite time and frequency transfer (TWSTFT) as a next-generation technique applicable to greater distances and resulting in higher precision. A method different from that used for code-based TWSTFT is required for carrier-phase TWSTFT. We propose a new method based on variations of carrier phases for the propagation of signals. Using the ETS-VIII satellite launched by the Japan Aerospace… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The carrier-phase-based TWsTFT, hereafter called TWsTFT cP, was first tried by Fonville et al [17]; however, it did not become operational. We demonstrated the TWsTFT cP experiment using s-band signals in a test geostationary satellite link [18]. In the experiment, the local signal used for frequency conversion at the satellite was generated from an on-board cesium clock for which the phase was thought to be stable enough for carrier phase measurements.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The carrier-phase-based TWsTFT, hereafter called TWsTFT cP, was first tried by Fonville et al [17]; however, it did not become operational. We demonstrated the TWsTFT cP experiment using s-band signals in a test geostationary satellite link [18]. In the experiment, the local signal used for frequency conversion at the satellite was generated from an on-board cesium clock for which the phase was thought to be stable enough for carrier phase measurements.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To compare the new time-frequency standards with the existing time frequency transfer technologies, average longer periods must be conducted. Advanced highprecision CP TWSTFT technology may provide sufficient precision over long distances, but this depends on the availability and reliability of satellite transponders [8]. The time transfer system based on optical fibers uses closed optical fibers as the transmission media; these fibers have the characteristics of high precision and non-interference, with an associated accuracy of such time synchronization better than 0.1 ns [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Time (epoch) is currently realized and transferred worldwide at the 1--to--30 ns level relative to defined Time Scales by using GPS common view, or GPS carrier--phase, or via Two--Way Satellite Time and Frequency Transfer (TWSTFT) using both code and carrier phase]. 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 With 1 ns timing uncertainty it can take weeks of signal averaging to accurately determine the frequency of the best Cs atomic fountain clocks at national standards labs that have fractional frequency uncertainties of ≈ 2x10 --16 . 21 And if that 1 ns transfer uncertainty could be maintained, it would take over 30 years of signal averaging to compare optical clocks at the now claimed fractional uncertainties of 2x10 --18 -an impractical, meaningless exercise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unless a practical time-transfer system can be developed, it is difficult to imagine how the advanced clocks could be put to practical commercial uses. Time (epoch) is currently realized and transferred worldwide at the level of 1-3 ns relative to defined Time Scales by using GPS common view, or GPS carrierphase, or via two-way satellite time and frequency transfer (TWSTFT) using both code and carrier phase [17][18][19][20]. With 1 ns timing uncertainty, it can take weeks of signal averaging to accurately determine the frequency of the best Cs atomic fountain clocks at national standards labs that have fractional frequency uncertainties of ≈ 2×10 −16 [21].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%