2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.01.131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carrier recombination in Cu doped CdS thin films: Photocurrent and optical studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results suggest that the charge separation efficiency exhibits an increasing trend along with the increase of x value from 0.03 to 0.10, and then a decreasing one with further enhancing the x value, and the Fe x Sr 1‐ x TiO 3 ( x = 0.10) has the most efficient charge separation process among those Fe‐doped products, which is in good agreement with the changing trend of photocatalytic performance shown in Figure a. The increasing charge separation efficiency might be contributed by more Fe 3+ ions doped at surface sites along with enhancing the x value from 0.03 to 0.10 as mentioned above, which can promote the photogenerated electron transfer of Fe‐doped SrTiO 3 ,, , while the decreasing charge one of Fe x Sr 1‐ x TiO 3 products with x > 0.10 can be due to the newly formed α‐Fe 2 O 3 NCs, which might act as charge recombination centers.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results suggest that the charge separation efficiency exhibits an increasing trend along with the increase of x value from 0.03 to 0.10, and then a decreasing one with further enhancing the x value, and the Fe x Sr 1‐ x TiO 3 ( x = 0.10) has the most efficient charge separation process among those Fe‐doped products, which is in good agreement with the changing trend of photocatalytic performance shown in Figure a. The increasing charge separation efficiency might be contributed by more Fe 3+ ions doped at surface sites along with enhancing the x value from 0.03 to 0.10 as mentioned above, which can promote the photogenerated electron transfer of Fe‐doped SrTiO 3 ,, , while the decreasing charge one of Fe x Sr 1‐ x TiO 3 products with x > 0.10 can be due to the newly formed α‐Fe 2 O 3 NCs, which might act as charge recombination centers.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Nevertheless, the single SrTiO 3 shows much lower PL peak intensity and higher photocurrent responses than those Fe x Sr 1‐ x TiO 3 (Figure ), suggesting that the single SrTiO 3 has the lowest defect concentration and charge recombination efficiency and Fe 3+ doping would generate defect states in the SrTiO 3 lattice to act as recombination sites, which is contrary to the actual result that the single SrTiO 3 shows very limited activity for N 2 fixation (Figure a). One of the main reasons is that the single SrTiO 3 has larger particle sizes and lower surface area than those Fe x Sr 1‐ x TiO 3 products (Figure ), which will not benefit to the adsorption and activation of N 2 molecules since the majority difficulty of N 2 fixation is the activation of high‐energy N≡N bond.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…For the Cu-doped CdS particles, excitonic emissions as well as surface state emission decreased after Cu doping; however, a new broad peak range from 650 nm to 850 nm emerged. This emission peak is clearly a Cu-related emission, which could be the Cu acceptor level (T2 level) originated from the triplet state of Cu 2+ [41]. With increase of doping level from 0.2% to 1%, this emission intensity decreased which could be the result of increasing nonradiative transitions from T2 level to the valence band of CdS with increase of Cu concentration in CdS [34].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, major approaches for doping of TiO 2 with transition metal ions (V, Cu, Fe, etc.) 7 have been limited due to high carrier recombination rate, 9 introduction of new ancillary impurity phases, 10 and poisonous sensitization of dyes 11,12 . Therefore, anionic-doping (non-metal-doping) is considered a more promising approach due to suppression of the titanium d-states localization and its profound effect in the narrowing the TiO 2 bandgap as compared to cationic-doping.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%