2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104577
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cascading activation in phonological planning and articulation: Evidence from spontaneous speech errors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, recent research has examined the phonetic structure of sound blends in which the properties of the mis-selected target sound are reflected in the error sound ( Goldrick and Blumstein, 2006 ). Cantonese has several consonant series and vowel oppositions that are suitable for a similar kind of probe and can potentially add to the evidence that such phonetic blends occur in spontaneous speech ( Alderete et al, 2021 ) with data from a non-Indo-European language. In sum, access to the underlying acoustic record of the error opens up many new research possibilities.…”
Section: Future Plansmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, recent research has examined the phonetic structure of sound blends in which the properties of the mis-selected target sound are reflected in the error sound ( Goldrick and Blumstein, 2006 ). Cantonese has several consonant series and vowel oppositions that are suitable for a similar kind of probe and can potentially add to the evidence that such phonetic blends occur in spontaneous speech ( Alderete et al, 2021 ) with data from a non-Indo-European language. In sum, access to the underlying acoustic record of the error opens up many new research possibilities.…”
Section: Future Plansmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For one thing, the contamination of speech by irrelevant environmental language is well documented (Harley, 1984). For another, as evidenced by errors such as duke and duchess → duck and doochess, activation spreads across words competing for selection (Simonini, 1956; see also MacKay, 1970), and moreover, gradient errors rather than full substitutions are readily elicited in high-conflict situations such as speeded tongue-twister recitation (Frisch & Wright, 2002;Goldrick & Blumstein, 2006;Goldrick et al, 2016;Goldstein et al, 2007;Mowrey & MacKay, 1990), as well as in spontaneous speech (Alderete et al, 2021). However, the processes elicited in the current study were more consistent with an inhibitory mechanism that ultimately increases the acoustic distance between target and competitor.…”
Section: Cognitive Inhibition Enhances Acoustic Contrastmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the voice onset time (VOT) of [p] produced in error (when [b] was intended) is slightly shorter (closer to [b]) than the VOT of non-errorful [p]. Such sub-phonemic differences in VOT, found in both lab-induced errors from tongue twisters (Goldrick & Blumstein, 2006) and naturally occurring speech errors (Alderete, Baese-Berk, Leung, & Goldrick, 2021) have been modeled as multiple inputs to a DNF representing VOT. Under selection dynamics, strong input from a voiceless stop (long VOT) and weaker input from voiced stop (short VOT) stabilize in a location that is slightly shifted towards the voiced stop, deriving the magnitude of empirically observed trace effects .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%